Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jacky2wong
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
61.
▲
PDB Support for DeepEval
(docs.confident-ai.com)
1 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
62.
▲
Test for Bias After Finetuning LLMs
(docs.confident-ai.com)
1 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
63.
▲
Measure Answer Relevancy of LLMs
(docs.confident-ai.com)
1 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
64.
▲
Test LLMs for Toxicness
(docs.confident-ai.com)
1 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
65.
▲
Auto-Evaluation of LLMs with DeepEval
(docs.confident-ai.com)
2 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
1 comments
66.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
One complaint we heard over and over was that no one likes to write tests when evaluating LLMs. We automate writing these tests by having ChatGPT generate sample queries and answers based on a given text. These test cases can then be run th
67.
▲
Test for LLM Hallucinations
(docs.confident-ai.com)
2 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
68.
▲
DeepEval – Neural Framework for Testing LLMs
(github.com)
2 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
69.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
For those that need help migrating their models to OpenAI enterprise and ensure consistency results - would recommend checking the open source repo https://github.com/confident-ai/deepeval
70.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
To be honest - I had the opposite feeling - I found it pretty easy to wrap my head around their abstractions. If anything - I believe their abstractions are quite clean as I was able to navigate their codebase quite easily. Their "cont
71.
▲
Unit Test LlamaIndex with DeepEval
(docs.confident-ai.com)
35 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
3 comments
72.
▲
Unit Testing for Rag
(github.com)
2 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
73.
▲
DeepEval CLI
(github.com)
2 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
74.
▲
Testing Rank Similarity for Rag
(docs.confident-ai.com)
1 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
75.
▲
Framework for evaluating LLM outputs with ML models
(docs.confident-ai.com)
2 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
76.
▲
Mental Model of Prisma Migrate
(prisma.io)
1 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
77.
▲
How to test LLM is non-toxic before pushing to prod
(docs.confident-ai.com)
2 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
78.
▲
Testing for Factual Consistency in LLMs
(docs.confident-ai.com)
1 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
79.
▲
How to measure ranking similarity for RAG systems
(docs.confident-ai.com)
1 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
80.
▲
How to unit test for LLM answer relevancy
(docs.confident-ai.com)
1 points
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
|
0 comments
81.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
Got it - that wasn't immediately intuitive from the suggested comment. Yes! Our roadmap will include ways to test other parts of the LLM application stack very soon!
82.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
A few publically shared evaluation datasets include: - HuggingFace Evaluate (and their 3 dashboards) - OpenAIEval - AnthropicEval
83.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
Thanks for the interesting question! From what I've observed from both academia and posts from a number of top organizations (with seemingly the exception of OpenAI) - all the models are trained on test data. That's why OpenAI see
84.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
Resolved all issues - thank you!
85.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
Interesting - I'm not really sure how this would work but I'm happy to discuss this in more detail - I see this being as a suggestion for what to do when tests fail. Happy to discuss this via email if you'd like. Feel free to
86.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
Thanks for the enormous amount of interest and questions in this post. I wanted to make a follow-up comment to answer all the questions above about differentiation, where we see issues in the current solution space and clarify the problem w
87.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
See reply above^ :)
88.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
Agreed. No one should ever have to touch YAML for writing unit tests for LLMs. Ever. Most people writing agents and LLM applications are Python developers/data scientists/ML engineers.
89.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
Hi thanks for letting us know - please feel free to let us know of any more bugs - we'll make sure to write better docs and fix the code. We're just a few days in!
90.
▲
by
jacky2wong
3y ago
Thanks. I've reviewed all of those solutions and happy to go into more detail in a later post. Here is our take: None of these solutions are built to fit seamlessly with the data team's workflow to collaborate and work together o
More ›