Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
jMyles
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
481.
▲
by
jMyles
1y ago
> with zero trust assumptions It's not that though. Not close. You are trusting the chip maker, whose process is secret (actually worse, it's almost certainly shared with the state).
482.
▲
by
jMyles
1y ago
Agreed. The problem(s) of scale are not only those of scaling up, but also scaling down. One of the best and most unsung benefits of solar is that it is profoundly easy and intuitive to build a very small (ie, vehicle- or house-sized) grid.
483.
▲
by
jMyles
1y ago
> no one remembers it. That doesn't resonate with my experience. People know about the murder, but aren't sure what to do. The murderer, who clearly had mental health issues (eg, having "you're fucked" on the dus
484.
▲
by
jMyles
1y ago
Well I guess the time scale is what determines the degree to which the distinction becomes opposition. AI is likely to persist for tens or hundreds of thousands of years in some form. Are any of today's nation states built to last th
485.
▲
by
jMyles
1y ago
...this is not AI for countries. This is AI for _governments_. Those two concepts are diametrically opposed to one another.
486.
▲
by
jMyles
1y ago
> Since then, some governments have tried to clean up the language of probability. After the Iraq War—which was influenced by misinterpreted intelligence While I laud the gracious application of Hanlon's Razor here, I also think tha
487.
▲
by
jMyles
1y ago
The good news is that the internet is, fundamentally and in a way that no legacy state can alter, not a place where IP is cognizable. You are free to copy bytes as you see fit, and the internet treats them identically whether they are rando
488.
▲
by
jMyles
1y ago
> only get concerned about speed when it reaches painful levels. ...and by then, the requests for performance are somewhere between onerous and ridiculous. I'm as wary of premature optimization as anyone, but I also have a healthy f
489.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
I'm game if you are.
490.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
> And if Shopify wants to take a cut of every sale from retailers based in California, they should be willing to comply with California law as well, For the moment, for purpose of consumer protections, fine. But on longer time scales,
491.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
If they're 60 years old and have lost three friends to boat collisions... probably?
492.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
I'm kinda surprised the article doesn't mention (and I have no idea the feasibility of) a system that works in the opposite direction as well: somehow communicating via sound waves the speed, heading, and distance (maybe possible
493.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
> is that really so ridiculous? Using the heavy hand of the state to threaten violence against people who make a particular tone... yes that is really so ridiculous. The tone is question is quite close to G2. So, if your guitar is slig
494.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
> let's focus on solving the original funding disaster The _original_ funding disaster is that this problem was delegated to the economic machinery of a nation-state, and humanity is presently in the process of evolving beyond natio
495.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
> What's the difference between that which optimized for what you call "engagement" and what the average user wants? People want joy, education, entertainment, etc. from watching a video. But there may be other ways of app
496.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
> Possibly the best "new but not the old" name ever: > The Aints (with a later iteration: The Aints!) - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Aints Oh my goodness, I second that nomination. :-) I had neve
497.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
Great question. Is there a particular setlist which you think is notable and which has such an instance? I'd love to converse about how to properly parse it.
498.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
Indeed this is an interesting edge case. Is there a real-world example of this to use as fodder for conversation? It'd be especially relevant if the material is widely covered by other bands, and is intermixed with traditional music.
499.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
We're working on a parser for our band's setlists, and we want it to be compatible (and eventually, to be able to cross-reference included songs with) setlists from Grateful Dead, Allman Brothers, Widespread Panic, Travelin'
500.
▲
A band has a guest and plays a song the guest wrote. Is it original or cover?
(github.com)
11 points
by
jMyles
2y ago
|
12 comments
501.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
Not sure the future of SMS in my life, but dang for whatever reason, people still want to use it. I don't have as much need for email-=>sms gateways, but what about the other way? I much prefer to handle comms on my desktop, and pr
502.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
1. I don't think that is necessarily so. We can look at the universe we're given for some obvious fundamental physical and mathematical laws. As sure as gravity, bytes can be copied. It's just part of the universe we live
503.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
The line of thinking you've displayed here is so obviously the inevitable trajectory of the internet; it's baffling that states are still clinging to denial. > Now, what if I get the highest fidelity speakers and the highest fi
504.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
Of course; I don't think anybody disputes that. But the political cover of "but think of the poor artists!" is used as a cudgel for situations where "we prefer to censor Bob!" is unpalatable.
505.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
It seems to me that harassment is similarly offensive regardless of the degree of automation. ...and it's not obvious that transmitting bytes (within frequency and bandwidth protocols) is ever justly criminal; they are trivial to ignor
506.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
Well, one rudimentary difference is that bytes can be (and seem wont to be) copied, whereas if you steal my jeans, I'm standing there in my underwear.
507.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
> The reality of our current international laws, going back centuries, disagrees Perhaps I need a bit of education here, but have there been _international_ laws regarding intellectual property for centuries?!
508.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
> why should we require human artists to be held to the same standards as automated software? Isn't this the same question as, "why should we allow general purpose computing?" If the technology of our age is our birthrigh
509.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
> It's not getting "better." It always just copied. That's all it /can/ do That's true of all the best artists ever. > They're just there to whitewash away liability from blatantly stealing some
510.
▲
by
jMyles
2y ago
> nobody in his right mind will create anything new only to be immediatly copied without anything in return If this take is serious, I can confidently tell you: for many professional artists, it's incorrect. I'm sure you didn&#
More ›