j1elo

28 ms·

451.
by j1elo 3y ago
Congrats! That I guess is great news for the future continued development of Pion. Also are there big plans for the v4 of pion/webrtc?
452.
by j1elo 3y ago
Hi Sean! I'm guessing this is derives as part of the recent collaboration with LiveKit to add SIP support, right? I had been looking at https://github.com/livekit/sip the other day, so it hasn't been much of
453.
by j1elo 3y ago
Go 1.21 is the version from which it is noticeable that they are pushing towards (re)implementing things that were lacking before due to missing support for generics. Like the new slices package, meant to do common operations on slices, tha
454.
by j1elo 3y ago
Go still doesn't have Set types. The usual thing to do is using a map of your type to either an empty struct, or maybe a bool, if I got that correctly (have only been using Go for a couple months so far) Did you implement your own Set
455.
by j1elo 3y ago
Yes, yes, and a thousand times yes. People usually says "so what, RAM is there to be used" (I even think I saw it in this thread). But when 3 of these bulky apps are eating the whole RAM and no more software can run because of the
456.
by j1elo 3y ago
On the other hand, in software-related matters, I have the increasing feeling that kludges and temporary decisions made in the "First do it" stage, tend to get carried on to infinity through the other phases. Thus, lots of stuff t
457.
by j1elo 3y ago
I think that makes sense; but doing it on the client means that your computer has to do the work for you, thus distributing the load among all clients. Doing it on the server would mean that their machine has to do the work for all players.
458.
by j1elo 3y ago
"just" is (tongue in cheek) a forbidden word in HN. Next thing you might find yourself claiming is that Dropbox is a worthless idea because it's "just" FTP. Btw tell me exactly how an aimbot that takes the visuals f
459.
by j1elo 3y ago
Will it show "suggested contents" in between the numbers of the speedometer?
460.
by j1elo 3y ago
Not only that. It seems that with all the millions they have, Slack devs were unable to implement the most basic bracket balancing in the link parser. Try to send a link with a title including square brackets, and contemplate the disaster t
461.
by j1elo 3y ago
Not sure why you're being downvoted. Even the Commons Clause itself is clear about it: https://commonsclause.com/#faq > Is this “Open Source”? > No.
462.
by j1elo 3y ago
Yeah, I meant the autoplay, aka. "Auto-queue next stream": https://newpipe.net/FAQ/tutorials/player-enable-autoplay/
463.
by j1elo 3y ago
I tried to do the same with music but for some reason the next enqueued song has the tendency of going straight up to 20 min, 60 min, 3 hour, 10 hour long videos. Not sure why. But this was reliably repeatable. Starting from any given song,
464.
by j1elo 3y ago
I never got over Windows 2000. That old grey theme was ugly, but an extremely clear and efficient design language. In wanting to keep on with the good and trusted, I would always disable all theming on Windows 7, which gave you basically th
465.
by j1elo 3y ago
It was very nice originally, when they sold themselves (at least in the EU) as a way to stay "at home", even share some time and meet the locals renting you their room, all for a fraction of what a hotel costs. But soon enough the
466.
by j1elo 3y ago
Comparing with Beyond Compare: https://imgur.com/a/xatzZt7 -- Hoping the conversion doesn't add extra noise, I converted them (with ImageMagick: `convert image.webp image.png`) and compared them (Beyond Compare do
467.
by j1elo 3y ago
But why to draw hairs between all 'ct' and 'st'? As a non-native speaker, is that some English weirdness that I have yet to learn about?
468.
by j1elo 3y ago
This prompted (pun intended) me to think about an interesting psychological effect. I wouldn't have been able to push the AI in that way. In some sense, there's some "humanity" in me that would have stopped ignoring the
469.
by j1elo 3y ago
I just read about this on a recent entry about FFmpeg, and thought it might interest the HN folks. Note to mods: The link has a title that could be confusing and isn't descriptive at all, so for the HN entry I took the title from the s
470.
by j1elo 3y ago
Interesting! I'm among today's lucky 10,000 in learning for the first time about VapourSynth. How come it only has 4 measly entries in HN, and none got any traction. I've posted a new entry, just for the curiosity of others.
471.
VapourSynth: A video processing framework with simplicity in mind(vapoursynth.com)
113 points by j1elo 3y ago|12 comments
472.
by j1elo 3y ago
I'm the only one not being able to see the first graph? it just doesn't fit horizontally, and it also doesn't allow me to scroll to the right either (on mobile, using Android Firefox)
473.
by j1elo 3y ago
Thanks for expanding on your point of view. Now that I read you, I'd say that we fundamentally agree. My experience has been to use carefully constructed Docker images that have the required dependencies to build the project. This remo
474.
by j1elo 3y ago
C++ with templating can take a while to compile, so for caching my build system would include mounting a Docker volume with contents of ~/.ccache/. This was well integrated with the rest of the scripts, so it would work equally fi
475.
by j1elo 3y ago
I'm in the apparently small group of people who ignores 90% of the made & shared features, and push back against making internal ops to depend too much to any particular CI system. We know how to build, package, and release our sof
476.
by j1elo 3y ago
Would have been nice to see the Google logo under the Sponsors list of Excalidraw, eh, Google? Would also have been nice their page even spelled it correctly... currently it says "Exclaidraw project"
477.
by j1elo 3y ago
> The regex crate doesn't support arbitrary look-around because it isn't known how to implement efficiently. A bit of a philosophical question: If how to write an efficient implementation is yet not known to man, ie. not a ma
478.
by j1elo 3y ago
> [[]] | implode crashes jq, and this was not fixed at the time of writing despite being known since five years. Well, taking into account that jq development has been halted for 5 years and only recently revived again, it's no wo
479.
by j1elo 3y ago
Only tangential. I usually enjoy reading public notes of other people, so that's what I did here too. On https://notes.billmill.org/programming/json/jq.html the author says that > jq appears to be largely
480.
by j1elo 3y ago
I guess Rust made the same reasoning than Python. For this kind of things, the PEP documents tend to be well based on experience and be a good guideline which even applies for other languages. Check the PEP 8 that I linked in my comment: al

More ›