j-bos

8 ms·

91.
by j-bos 6mo ago
I hear what you're saying man, but honestly it's a sensor. Sensors can fail all the time even without deliberate tampering. It doesn't seem to really make sense to have a single one in a single location. Besides for clarity,
92.
by j-bos 6mo ago
But why are they only using one sensor?
93.
by j-bos 6mo ago
"based entirely on feels" Now there's a word I haven't heard in a long, long time.
94.
by j-bos 6mo ago
Seems like a great challenge for all these systems, see fromtier labs serving quants when under hesvy load.
95.
by j-bos 6mo ago
This. I see much cheap naysaying without referenece to the vuln hashes. If it is smoke and mirrors, then the naysayers should loudly shout down the specific hashes and when they get revealed, or don't, then they will have done a great
96.
by j-bos 6mo ago
I do, inevitable, but ime the prompts force certain behaviors at similar strength (instruction following). So it's one thing that the model is biased towards any particular direction by its latent space, it's another that it is bi
97.
by j-bos 6mo ago
Agreed. Sprawling system prompts like that are building for the least common denominator, nerfing for anyone or anytime going further.
98.
by j-bos 6mo ago
Yeah for anyone seriously using these models I highly reccomend reading the Mythos system card, esp the sections on analyzing it's internal non verbalized states. Save a lot of head wall banging.
99.
by j-bos 6mo ago
As sibling comments mentioned deceptive comparison as well. How about comparing in percentage of Gross Energy Output. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S09218...
100.
by j-bos 6mo ago
What's your setup/usecase? Enhanced intellisense?
101.
by j-bos 6mo ago
I guess they don't like Monika.
102.
by j-bos 6mo ago
Isn't it like underground? Why would it be expensive?
103.
by j-bos 6mo ago
Maybe similar to boy who cried wolf?
104.
by j-bos 6mo ago
You can do that. It's called a restricted donation. If you make a donation with a cover letter or a check memoizing a specific purpose and the nonprofit accepts it, then by law they're legally obligated to follow through and use t
105.
by j-bos 6mo ago
At work where LLM based tooling is being pushed haaard, I'm amazed every day that developers don't know, let alone second nature intuit, this and other emergent behavior of LLMs. But seeing that lack here on hn with an article on
106.
by j-bos 6mo ago
It seems to be human nature to chase after easy to understand solutions rather than addressing ifficult bottlenecks and friction. Doctors are a great example. In order to be a doctor, you have to study for 12 years. But four of those years
107.
by j-bos 6mo ago
Thanks appreciate the broader context in this post. As to your meta comment, besides bots, I think a lot of people are facing a great deal of pain and fear. They're emotional and even in hn a critical mass has switched to reading and w
108.
by j-bos 7mo ago
So I neither downvoted nor upvoted you, but I think people may be downvoting, in addition to the fact that they just don't like the thing, based on the fact that you didn't directly answer the question. Specifically, what are you
109.
Bilt requires access to all unrelated transactions(bilt.com)
2 points by j-bos 7mo ago|1 comments
110.
by j-bos 7mo ago
Bilt is a rent payment platform required by some leasing companies. In order to use the platform (often a requirement by landlords), one must consent to a series of broad clickwrap. The most egregious of which is that by paying with a card
111.
by j-bos 7mo ago
Thanks for the nuance. I guess my issue is that pervasive recording has already been normalized, db hacks are effectively normalized (if illegal) so the public spaces are super public, as of yesterday not tomorrow.
112.
by j-bos 7mo ago
That genie's out of the bottle, couple cheap cameras with cheap AI recognition and tracking, and every network getting pwned by somebody the result is, public spaces become obscenely public. The worst is private spaces, like when a tec
113.
by j-bos 7mo ago
Very cool, worth a show hn
114.
by j-bos 7mo ago
To be clear, I wasn't exclusively referring to government. I was actually only thinking of the use of git-like version control across a number of different technical domains, law, design, book writing, architecture, etc
115.
by j-bos 7mo ago
> Everyone in government knows That's part of the point good rafram, I'm not in government but I've looked up laws for at least three jurisdictions and have never encountered version control. A tool at the bottom of a draw
116.
by j-bos 7mo ago
This is brilliant. I wish this were available for all legislations. There's so many inefficiencies that are trivially solved with existing tech frameworks.
117.
by j-bos 7mo ago
This story cones uo time and time again, people rail about the data buyer, but practically speaking any one or thing can buy that data and use it against you and yours. The very collection/assembly of life data is dangerous.
118.
by j-bos 7mo ago
You can customize the bahavior.
119.
by j-bos 7mo ago
So I agree with you in that it's ugly, and they do take the lion's share of benefit from public research. That said, the public research doesn't run human trials, scale up, or QC production. Still ugly, still valuable.
120.
by j-bos 7mo ago
Yeah, it's rhymes with people getting mad about pharmacos charging outrageous prices for life saving drugs they developed in order to charge outrageous prices. In both cases (drugs and OSS) it's an ugly process that produces great

More ›