ivan_gammel

7 ms·

91.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
In development of medical devices existing quality controls are already working well, right?
92.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
More like certified products. New ISO standard may require professional liability for software products, which will be adopted as requirement by big consumers and will pull the industry into certification loop, because insurers will ask for
93.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
Automated tests are no longer expensive to write and nowadays less expensive to execute.
94.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
> because anything a QA engineer can do manually can be automated. Looks like you never worked with a decent QA team and do not understand the full scope of quality management. They have plenty of creative tasks not aligned with other ro
95.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
There are two very important ideas in this article, which I fully agree with: QA are not the only people responsible for quality - entire team is. QA act as experts and drivers of quality management process, but they should not and are not
96.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
>On the other hand isn't this how the russian revolution happened? It happened because Russian empire (and German empire) lacked state security apparatus adequate to the threat. It was fixed by most authoritarian states after that,
97.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
I fully agree with you, it doesn’t. However I wasn’t saying that, so I have to conclude that you are speaking to someone else here, making up arguments from an imaginary opponent, and I’m not needed here. Good luck.
98.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
This conversation is not about „employees thinking/not thinking about shareholders“. You are cherry-picking that topic and taking it out of context, for what reason exactly? I have explained already a few times why and what context mat
99.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
> They get money for their labor. Yes, and what is the essence of that labor? It is to create profits for shareholders. You are not getting paid to contribute to toxic culture or to seize the means of production. CEO could have been in t
100.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
> no employment contract I've ever signed requires The sole reason for existence of for-profit corporations does not have to be explicitly stated in the contract. It’s implied and better be understood. > does not mean blind alleg
101.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
> That's not clear at all. Why do you say so? Do you see any, even little sign of constructive criticism in what she said? Anything that could improve corporate culture or help her peers or management to understand the problem? Any
102.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
This sounds like AI-written comment, at least in the first part. What I do not get is why are you dismissing the argument about number of visits. 3D printed braces are still braces. They require manual adjustment for each treatment stage. A
103.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
The “people who are critical of you” are very broad category that includes both toxic behavior and constructive disagreement. The former must not be tolerated, the latter can be encouraged as long as it’s not a blocker. In this case it is c
104.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
LightForce still requires a lot of visits to the doctor. Nice source of revenue for orthos. Aligners may become more accessible to patients, because that tech is more scalable by design.
105.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
1. There‘s always a reason or two for the treatment. The problems with bite may affect your health in various ways. There’s aesthetic component in it, sometimes even cultural preferences for how your teeth should look like. But let’s say pa
106.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
IIRC, yes. It’s been some time ago, I don’t know how manufacturing looks now. It’s different process compared to 3D printing at home. It doesn’t mean it should be different, it just has to maintain certain properties. I’m not chemical or bi
107.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
It is definitely not that simple for a number of reasons. Yes, aligners and retainers in theory may be printed on some commercially available hardware. At your own risk, because you will be printing a medical device and you will need: 1. A
108.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
> What percentage of your inputs are invalid numbers and why ? This is a wrong question to ask in this context. The right question to ask is when actually exceptional flow becomes a performance bottleneck. Because, obviously, in a deskto
109.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
It does not. If you need to parse a number, you use standard library and you will be fine. The described case with huge impact on hot path is the demonstration why using brains is important. The developer that will get into this mess is the
110.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
Normally in 100% cases, with parseInt/parseDouble etc. Getting NumberFormatException so frequently on a hot path that it impacts performance means, that you aren’t solving the parsing number problem, you are solving a guessing type pro
111.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
God, please make me unsee it. That‘s a cool trick that turns into an anti-pattern itself if abused.
112.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
TBH, I do not see how Java as a language steers anyone to use one those shotguns. E.g. the knowledge about algorithmic complexity is foundational, the StringBuilder is junior-level basic knowledge.
113.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
The answer is simple: model optimized for storage and model designed for processing are two different things. The languages used to describe and query them have to be different.
114.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
That could be something to put on Tinder profile.
115.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
There’s probably a huge case for corruption. And of course he can be declared national threat and foreign agent. I mean, just look what Putin does within his constitutional limits. When there’s choice between the bad (block Trump and alli
116.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
> While I think this is a huge boon, have you ever published a package on the Maven Central repository? I must confess I haven't in a few years now, but when I did until ~3 years ago it was a major pain in the ass. And every release
117.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
It‘s easier to evolve library code. If Java would ever infer type of constants from initializer (makes more sense than a new keyword), it could look nice and powerful: private final LOG = lazy(logger(MyThing.class));
118.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
With SSR/HTMX/HATEOAS the amount of code executed on client side is relatively minor and does not justify the unstable JS/TS tooling and frameworks, and the security nightmare which is NPM-based supply chain.
119.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
Most of backend development on Java is procedural with OO syntax and ability to replace something in the chain of calls with stub in tests. Spring beans are usually stateless singletons containing a few references.
120.
by ivan_gammel 7mo ago
Spring Boot isn‘t bad. It‘s opinionated about configurations and dependencies. Its main advantage is that you can start shipping production-quality code very quickly, focusing on business problems rather than anything else. Vibe coding on i

More ›