item007

6 ms·

61.
by item007 8mo ago
That’s a really solid workflow: keep capture friction low in Logseq, then do “topic export → LLM consolidation” when you actually need a brief. The wiki-link mismatch problem also sounds like a naming/alias layer issue more than retrie
62.
by item007 8mo ago
That’s a super common pattern: capture is easy, retrieval isn’t, and fragmentation makes it worse. Two small things that often help without changing your whole setup: Keep a single “Meeting Inbox” note/page where all meetings land firs
63.
by item007 8mo ago
You're totally right — fine-grained “what I’m working on” tracking is usually not worth the overhead unless it’s tied to billing or some hard accountability. One direction I’m exploring is to stop treating context as a single ground-tr
64.
by item007 8mo ago
Strongly agree. I think the biggest leverage is forcing explicit targets + a small, user-defined workflow, otherwise automation becomes vague and noisy. One direction I’m exploring is a constrained “active projects” list (only a few at a ti
65.
by item007 8mo ago
Nice write-up — I like the “capture with lightweight hashtags, then batch-organize with an LLM” approach. Curious: what part created the most friction before you automated it — capturing, tagging consistency, or resurfacing when you actuall
66.
by item007 8mo ago
Totally agree — “notes as offloading” is real, and for design/dev work swipe files are legitimately high ROI (inspo + implementation references). Concerns isn’t trying to turn everything into more notes. The premise is: most useful con
67.
by item007 8mo ago
This resonates — the real superpower is having a clear “no”, not capturing everything. One idea I’m exploring with *Concerns* is making that constraint explicit: when you set “active goals/projects”, you can only keep a *small fixed nu
68.
by item007 8mo ago
Totally agree — learning to prune the “good intentions” pile is a real productivity upgrade. Out of curiosity: do you have a simple rule for what you cut (age-based, relevance to current projects, or “if it didn’t turn into action, delete”)
69.
by item007 8mo ago
Totally get it — paper forces focus and has near-zero overhead. Out of curiosity, is the “one-week horizon” a deliberate constraint to avoid backlog guilt, or just what naturally works for you?
70.
by item007 8mo ago
I read your post — the `thread` file structure (Bet / Context / Next steps / DoD / Log) is a really clean “re-entrance artifact” for both humans and agents. One thought: it also gives you a natural closed-loop signal —
71.
by item007 8mo ago
I think this is an underrated point. A lot of “knowledge management” is really anxiety management — saving feels like progress, and deleting feels like losing options. One thing I’m trying to learn is whether the “fix” is actually less inta
72.
by item007 8mo ago
Thanks for sharing—it seems you have an extraordinary brain! I'm also very curious, what makes a retrieval moment “great” and how often it happens.If someone could help you increase the likelihood of it happening, would you find that v
73.
by item007 8mo ago
Thank you for sharing your excellent habit. May I ask, do you record all the information you receive—emails, articles, posts, etc.—that you find useful as notes? My current idea extends beyond just notes to encompass all the information you
74.
by item007 8mo ago
Validate that notes can be scratchpads for inspiration while action lists are separate. Whether you’d find value in connecting ideas and tasks automatically?
75.
by item007 8mo ago
Thank you for sharing the email‑to‑self workflow and regular review habit. How often you prune the folder and whether you’d appreciate intelligent reminders.
76.
by item007 8mo ago
Cool! This just goes to show that old savings can sometimes come in handy.
77.
by item007 8mo ago
Nice step! If you are ok to help, check my bio for more.
78.
by item007 8mo ago
Perfect example. In 6 months, what would make you actually resurface this link — a search term, a weekly digest, or a “you’re working on X, this might help” nudge?
79.
by item007 8mo ago
There are a few directions I know but not sure: “semantic search via embeddings” plugins (Obsidian Semantic Search is one example) local-first assistants via Ollama (e.g. obsidian-local-gpt) full “RAG over your vault” projects (I’ve seen Ob
80.
by item007 8mo ago
Respect — this is the most honest system: if it’s older than X, it wasn’t important enough. Out of curiosity, what’s the category that still slips through that approach (if any): recurring obligations, long-horizon projects, or “someday may
81.
by item007 8mo ago
That’s an important counterpoint: sometimes the fix is less intake, not better retrieval. What do your “filtered digests” look like (sources + cadence), and what makes them trustworthy enough to replace capture? This might be a better wedge
82.
by item007 8mo ago
Totally understand the reaction. It’s not a product pitch (no product yet) — I’m validating whether the problem exists and what constraints matter before writing code. If you have 10 seconds: do you ever feel “saved info turns into a gravey
83.
by item007 8mo ago
Fair critique. I probably didn’t explain the wedge clearly. I’m not trying to optimize Obsidian setups — I’m testing whether “right-time recall → next action” is a real pain vs a non-problem for most users. For you personally, what’s the sm
84.
by item007 8mo ago
Absolutely right! The immediate feedback and sense of accomplishment from doing things yourself can be incredibly satisfying. But AI actually excels at providing instant positive reinforcement in this area—especially Vibe Coding. It's
85.
by item007 8mo ago
Thank you for your free comments. That makes sense. Local-first seems like the only viable starting point for “important” notes. On pricing: would you prefer a one-time purchase, or “bring your own model” (Ollama etc.) so the ongoing cost i
86.
by item007 8mo ago
Appreciate the clear boundary. If we reframe it as non-generative assistance (pure local indexing + better retrieval, no writing), would that still be a “no”, or is the hard line specifically about model processing?
87.
by item007 8mo ago
Totally fair. If it isn’t self-hosted / open-source, many people will never allow it near their notes. If you imagine a local-first version: what would you actually want first — (a) local semantic search/RAG, (b) extracting action
88.
by item007 8mo ago
Thank you for your feedback. That makes sense — for many people notes are primarily a memory/idea-filter, not a task generator. Context, long-term memory, and storage issues are indeed challenges currently facing AI and large language
89.
by item007 8mo ago
"anti-memory system" Cool~！ When it comes to stimulating AI creativity, it may indeed be better to impose fewer constraints. However, in most scenarios, problems are likely still solved through simple information aggregation, refi
90.
by item007 8mo ago
+1 to “organization as procrastination”. I’m trying to avoid making the archive more “beautiful” and instead make it more actionable. It seems you're more accustomed to treating stored information as memories rather than a knowledge ba

More ›