Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
israrkhan
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
israrkhan
3y ago
EU regulators would rather see a company go bankrupt than getting acquired at 3x market cap.
92.
▲
by
israrkhan
3y ago
$2 is median daily wage for several countries. Negligible in US but not everywhere source: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/daily-median-income
93.
▲
by
israrkhan
3y ago
There are several DSP & VLIW platforms that have their own toolchain (not gcc), and they only support C programming language (for example Trimedia VLIW processors, TM1300, PNX1500, PNX1700 and a lot more SoC based on TM32/TM64 core
94.
▲
by
israrkhan
3y ago
Despite what you may think, C is still the most portable language. I can think of several embedded platforms where Rust or C++ is not even an option.
95.
▲
by
israrkhan
3y ago
They are probably safe from XYZ startup. The real threat comes from XYZ enterprise. Like what Amazon did to Elastic.
96.
▲
by
israrkhan
3y ago
make is not very well suited for extremely large projects (Android or some other OS distribution for example). Bazel works best in such scenarios. it is not just for C++, it has support for other languages too, and in IMO it works better th
97.
▲
by
israrkhan
3y ago
Also In cloud environments, I would much rather trust an eBPF program, than a kernel module.
98.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
In addition to lost of focus, and loss of respect, he also sold lots of shares after acquiring twitter (presumably to prepare for recession). That is also a contributing factor.
99.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
Great stuff. I can already see few use cases for this. However, I think having more technical details about how to go about reversing and implementing new hardware components for QEMU will be great. The destination may not be interesting to
100.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
If you look at vim commit history, it was pretty much stagnant for a long period of time, and then activity picked up in 2016, when it finally got competition from neovim. IMO governance model for vim, is not much receptive to community con
101.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
I find lots of arguments about who was actually more arrogant. But lets look at it from objective perspective. Looking at neovim[1] vs vim[2] contribution Bram is top contributor for vim. 16,211 commit right now. Second top most contributor
102.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
I dont blame the parent for paranoia. NIST has been involved in standardizing protocol/algorithms with backdoors. It is not a controversary, it is documented. Although they pulled off the standard when it became public news [1]. [1] h
103.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
It is result of decompilation/disassembling Apple's binaries. I have done this in past. Apple uses some sort of thirdparty whitebox crypto and code obfuscation tool, that hides underlying algorithm into a mess. Underlying algorith
104.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
I second this.. very useful for vector NLP and other ML tasks.
105.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
and to back up your point... There should be at least 2 implementations for anything to be a spec/standard.
106.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
I like the course, but more than the course I like various recommendation in this post. This is best part of HN.
107.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
I was a technical preview user, and i am getting this error : GitHub Copilot could not connect to server. Extension activation failed: "User not authorized"
108.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
For people advocating use of C++ instead of C, keep in mind there are several platforms (mostly embedded) that only support C and not C++. Also there are many projects that make use of C only. If C++ is available, I agree one should use it,
109.
▲
by
israrkhan
4y ago
I am afraid NLP is becoming a game of scale. Large scale models improve the quality but makes it prohibitively expensive to train, and even host such models.
110.
▲
by
israrkhan
5y ago
This hackernews post and other media coverage is getting the job done. Yesterday I saw they were at 3.2K stars, and right now they are 8.7 stars. I suspect this event will get them more users and will turn out better for them in the long ru
111.
▲
by
israrkhan
5y ago
Not sure why but this site is being detected as a malware by our CORP detection system "This site is blocked due to a security threat."
112.
▲
by
israrkhan
5y ago
There can be legitimate reasons for restricting access to IoT traffic, and data may not be user data at all. Imagine an IoT light bulb, that can be controlled via voice assistants and IoT vendor's mobile app. This bulb talks to some s
113.
▲
by
israrkhan
5y ago
if you are using neovim, nvim-dap has support for debug adapters, which includes gdb in addition to several other languages (python, nodejs, java etc). Here [1] are available debug adapters. It is noteable that nvim-dap just provides suppor
114.
▲
by
israrkhan
5y ago
You don't own the communication as a network operator, unless you can also prove that you have control over the device. IoT devices sometime rely on sending sensitive data to their backends. This data may include API keys, client authe
115.
▲
by
israrkhan
5y ago
The younger generation is mostly using alternate platforms, like snapchat. Facebook can benefit by hooking the kids to its platform at earlier stage and profit from it later.
116.
▲
by
israrkhan
6y ago
For some reason, this site is being blocked by our corporate security software "This site is blocked due to a security threat."
117.
▲
RISC-V based beagleboard coming to market
(beagleboard.org)
2 points
by
israrkhan
6y ago
|
1 comments
118.
▲
by
israrkhan
6y ago
> Their logistical chain does not rely upon a system of (often fellow American) warehouse workers who are pushed to the breaking point. Just couple of days ago there was this article on front page of HN https://9to5mac.com
119.
▲
by
israrkhan
6y ago
No matter who makes the driverless cars, they will still need a network to run those cars on. I think Uber/Lyft area better off allowing thirdparty self-driving cars on their network. Waymo on other hand is trying to build its own netw
120.
▲
by
israrkhan
6y ago
I remember the 'One' craze a Microsoft started from an internal movement called "One Microsoft". Microsoft traditionally had lots of different divisions/products competing with each other, and those products did no
More ›