iso1631

20 ms·

661.
by iso1631 10mo ago
In my mind when I was 13 I played Carmageddon and GTA1 In reality I was 15 when they came out. The graphics in GTA weren't much different to Frogger. Doom and Quake involved blasting monsters, not people. Duke Nukem 3D, Halflife had ve
662.
by iso1631 10mo ago
It's not set in stone, its just used as an excuse. Or a thought terminating cliche. From OP: > the First Amendment (with an exception existing for pornography) The text is not > Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of
663.
by iso1631 10mo ago
Sorry I meant to say google aren't subpoenaing The people I want to protect my privacy from are google, facebook, amazon, they can't subpoena my IP, they can track me just fine though.
664.
by iso1631 10mo ago
I recently moved house and looked at a new offer from a new ISP for a long term lockin but a cheap price. They used CG-NAT. I instead chose one which gives me as many ipv4s or ipv6s as I can reasonably use, doesn't oversubscribe its up
665.
by iso1631 10mo ago
IPv4s have been bought and sold for years https://auctions.ipv4.global/prior-sales Prices have been going down in nonimal terms for years, let alone real terms. In terms of investment they're a terrible asset.
666.
by iso1631 10mo ago
Google aren't subpoenaed Perhaps this is the difference, some people are concerned with being anonymous from companies like google, amazon, etc. Some don't mind that, as long as they are anonymous from a government. Your mention o
667.
by iso1631 10mo ago
You can nat all your ipv6 traffic behind a single IP if you want. Or a new IP for every connection. Realistically though there's enough fingerprinting in browsers to track you regardless of your public IP and whether it's shared b
668.
by iso1631 10mo ago
If 100 million people vote for someone who promises an instant fix to anything, then they deserve what they get.
669.
by iso1631 10mo ago
There in America your trains have steps down to the floor so letting people off at level crossings are fine. You also tend to have American railways are far less regimented than European or Chinese, when you have 3 trains a day you can do s
670.
by iso1631 10mo ago
> bit of a safety issue OK, so you disgorge however many people, at what age, with or without babies in ipushchairs or people in wheelchairs, onto the tracks, and they avoid the passing 100mph trains, they then walk along in the dark and
671.
by iso1631 10mo ago
Or maybe the tracks the train was routed onto didn't have platforms at the station. In 3rd world countries it might be acceptable for people to jump out of 5-foot high carriages onto live tracks with trains running at 100mph for conven
672.
by iso1631 10mo ago
I have no opinion on Chrome skins and forks as they are still chromium
673.
by iso1631 10mo ago
There's only two alternatives, safari and chrome-based browsers. Safari isn't cross platform either
674.
by iso1631 10mo ago
Wikimedia stats from last year put it at 15% of desktop browsers, ahead of Safari and Edge.
675.
by iso1631 10mo ago
Clinton and Obama seem very different results to Reagan/BushI and BushII Odd that.
676.
by iso1631 10mo ago
> How about the rich say that 50% of the economy should pay their fair share? Someone with $1b of assets gets far more value from a modern stable western society than someone with $10k of assets
677.
by iso1631 10mo ago
To be in the top .1% you need a wealth of about $60m, certainly nothing to be worried about, it gives you a very nice standard of living. But it's a lot nearer to someone at the 90%ile wealth of about $2m than the kind of power that th
678.
by iso1631 10mo ago
Raising money through taxing wealth is far easier than raising money through taxing income when nobody has jobs.
679.
by iso1631 10mo ago
1% of Americans would be over 3 million people, not a couple hundred.
680.
by iso1631 10mo ago
It's crazy how in 1992 the US federal deficit was 4% of GDP During Clintons term this turned around to being a 2.3% surplus in 2000. Just 25 years ago the US was spending less than it was taking in tax. The Bush came in and that surplu
681.
by iso1631 11mo ago
Adverts should be banned, full stop.
682.
by iso1631 11mo ago
The sports gambling craze in the uk started after I managed to almost entirely exclude adverts from my life -- the main adverts I see are on the escalators on the tube and tend to be for shows. Even then I try to avoid the tube and walk ins
683.
by iso1631 11mo ago
HS2 also includes major stations - a 6 platform one almost entirely underground in west london, a multi-platform extension in central london, a new station in central birmingham, a new 4 platform outside of Birmingham
684.
by iso1631 11mo ago
advertising ruins everything, users don't want to change to other services, news at 11.
685.
by iso1631 11mo ago
IP level blocks will work fine for that
686.
by iso1631 11mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wech_Baghtu_wedding_party_airs...
687.
by iso1631 11mo ago
There's no (current) plans to drop below 45 day certificates with an expected renewal with 2 weeks to go. I agree if cert lifetimes drop towards week long then it becomes problematic. A sensible thing at that point is to ensure you can
688.
by iso1631 11mo ago
If you generate the root CA sure. However name constraints aren't well supported. A far better option would be to allow me, the user, to do this in the user agent. I can import my mitm cert and today I can trust it for "abc123.com
689.
by iso1631 11mo ago
It's also normally deployed by companies who want this level of access anyway If you don't then you're simply open to encrypted comms over your deep inspection TLS breaking box anyway
690.
by iso1631 11mo ago
A process with kernel level permissions can patch into userspace process an intercept calls. For example https://github.com/SebastienWae/sslsnoop

More ›