isaachier

9 ms·

1. 91.▲
   by isaachier 9y ago

   I'd need to know more about the details to answer completely. I think CMake does have a complicated syntax, yet I think it is worth the nuisance in most cases. Many tools can use CMake's compilation database for configuration, suc
2. 92.▲
   by isaachier 9y ago

   CMake is mostly dedicated to C/C++ projects, but also has built-in support for assembly, Fortran, and Java. CMake has templates for adding a new language as well. The benefits are: cross-platform "shell" commands (you can cop
3. 93.▲
   by isaachier 9y ago

   Only really makes sense when you need to generate targets from a series of inputs. The targets don't have to be files, but it helps if they are to preserve the timestamp.
4. 94.▲
   by isaachier 9y ago

   I started my career with C++ development and never used a direct makefile in any of my projects. When I write C/C++, I use CMake. My current job has me programming in Go where people seem to love makefiles, but I consistently find bugs