irjustin

10 ms·

61.
by irjustin 7mo ago
Sorry i completely missed this. If you don't see it, it's okay - I probalby miss any replys going forward. Being upfront, I have no idea what I'm talking about. Just some arm chair engineer. The poster needed 6 parts which is
62.
by irjustin 8mo ago
You grab a "rough amount" and by using weight all you need to do is diff 2,3,4? Ideally 5 and under. it's very easy to count <=5 visually, but if your package requires 12 nuts, repeatedly counting up to 12 is so stressful
63.
by irjustin 8mo ago
> Is this done because of the error in weighing the smallest parts, so they have a margin for error by allowing for an extra 1 or 2? This is a secondary benefit, the primary benefit is if the end user loses/breaks one. That part ver
64.
by irjustin 8mo ago
At scale, use weight and supply 1 or 2 extra. This is how pretty much every IKEA, LEGO, etc works with very small, cheap parts. End users benefit because it's easy to drop/lose/break one.
65.
by irjustin 8mo ago
Probably coincidence - general market is up strongly too. Or, too hard to tell anyway.
66.
by irjustin 8mo ago
That is just the part that gets the most press. Having lived here for a while now. 1. At a young age, you're taught to follow the rules. 2. "Someone's always watching". Lots of CCTV. Community reports. 3. Plenty of polic
67.
by irjustin 8mo ago
I was more responding to the part about not trusting your own gov cuz how do you build a system where you don't trust a central authority when identity is required. I don't think it's possible.
68.
by irjustin 8mo ago
I'll bite. > It's not zero knowledge for me then. Also - if there is ANY possibility to track anyone. And/or centrally mark someone "nonverified" then it makes more problems than solves. > Even if I trust my g
69.
by irjustin 8mo ago
While likely true, that's not how our brains work.
70.
by irjustin 8mo ago
> why we would want to detect Alzheimer’s At a personal level, I've been through this with my grandfather. I want to know. My family wants to know. I want to prepare because there are things I want to do today that I know I won&#x27
71.
by irjustin 8mo ago
Literally - this is my friend =( For him, it was something like a ~$30m pizza at peak. We're asked not to bring it up.
72.
by irjustin 8mo ago
FWIW, these studies are too early. Large orgs have very sensitive data privacy considerations and they're only right now going through the evaluation cycles. Case in point, this past week, I learned Deloitte only recently gave the appr
73.
by irjustin 8mo ago
If we're being strict to peons, then no, that's the human's voice - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5r06heQ5HsI .
74.
by irjustin 9mo ago
At these scales, financial and social are very intertwined, it's both.
75.
by irjustin 9mo ago
In broad strokes - disagree. This is the knife-food vs knife-stab vs gun argument. Just because you can cook with a hammer doesn't make it its purpose.
76.
by irjustin 9mo ago
Yeah I guess I just don't see eye-to-eye on this. I 100% understand those frustrations. That the "detectors" should've been more accurate, or the fears, battery of tests, and costs associated of time and money. But, if y
77.
by irjustin 9mo ago
How is this apples-apples at all? But to answer directly... yes? yes, I am. [edit] A bit it more real. My blood pressure monitor says my bp is 200/160. Chat says you're dead get yourself to a hospital. Get to the hospital and says
78.
by irjustin 9mo ago
Isn't it two sides to the same coin? You should be happy about it that it's not the thing specifically when the signs pointed towards it being "the thing"?
79.
by irjustin 9mo ago
It's a different form of guaranteed payout where their value is a multiple on the next round or buyout event. Both guaranteed payout and multiplier are forms lowering your specific allocation of the evaluation so you get a larger payou
80.
by irjustin 9mo ago
There's a lot of speculation about how different rounds will get paid out. Unless someone has insider information and is willing to post, we have absolutely no idea who was made whole, who lost and/or who gained. At the size of Br
81.
by irjustin 9mo ago
Tom Scott made a solid video on this years ago[0]. I would love to go back to paper elections, even with all its problems (hanging chads anyone?). Let's make attack scaling as difficult as possible. [0] https://www.youtube.c
82.
by irjustin 9mo ago
Isn't that just 4 sats and it looks like that because of long exposure?
83.
by irjustin 9mo ago
In terms of quality they are there, now it's expansion. I, for one, am quite excited for all this competition. I don't care who makes my level 4/5 self driver, I just want it now.
84.
by irjustin 9mo ago
Possibly the most brilliant are around: - https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/ederplan/2026/01/19/2230 - https://www.foto-webcam.eu/webcam/ederplan/2026/01/19/
85.
by irjustin 9mo ago
This comment somehow comes off as obtuse. Still, I'm confused as to what you're mentally expecting.
86.
by irjustin 9mo ago
Make it opt-in and I'm all for it. The REAL problem becomes, who gets funding? ouch
87.
by irjustin 9mo ago
> Sounds like you’ve maybe never actually run a service or API library at scale. What was the saying? When your scale is big enough, even your bugs have users.
88.
by irjustin 9mo ago
> tax support for these kinds of things What are you hoping for with tax support?
89.
by irjustin 9mo ago
Late to the party, I really wish everyone would copy Rails + Ruby, but specifically it's Rails additions. 2 things it got right: 1. Like the article a great API - Time.current.in_time_zone('America/Los_Angeles') + 3.days
90.
by irjustin 9mo ago
Also WFH is still around. Sure RTO is being forced but it's not universal. Lots of orgs are still hybrid.

More ›