Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
iririririr
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
31.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
this is 100% in the hands of the SoC manufacturer. Android versions are locked to kernel versions, which are locked to binary drivers to run your hardware. there's no way around that and you can't reverse engineer or do anything i
32.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
you will be asked for a phone number then.
33.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
this is much more realistic to anyone who knows anything about actually implementing llm agents. this "swarm" is much more likely the work of one agent overseeing others. this is a very simple case of an llm focusing on a dumb pat
34.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
that haven't been true since pixel 4. it just picks your phone in the background. a burner sim, like a literal criminal, is the only way today.
35.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
do not engage this comment. it's either completely and honestly someone not technical missing the point entirely, or more likely trolling.
36.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
every single comment in this thread about leaving the app store and using fdroid etc... are we forgetting google already announced they will shut it all down in a few months?
37.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
ok, 10%. but you're trading full root/admin access to game code on your pc... is it really really worth? People are so brain washed that it is essential that here we are, sad companies won't take the option you giving the
38.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
will never understand people who opt for a rootkit just for a 0,1% chance of a match without cheaters. you're all the worse.
39.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
llama4, why moved away from the stirner content?
40.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
don't write a crap site that fall to pieces with a million unauthenticated users *shrugemoji
41.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
the point is if their solution is as magical because of the monopoly they have. which is what their marketing hint at (and everyone here internalized, judging by this thread). why do you feel like discussing features was relevant?
42.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
love the timeline where China has more product safety agencies than the usa...
43.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
lol. people will vote you and not realize the irony. just look at all the comments "this is a fair and common mistake" that are not being ironic.
44.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
because the distro is all about convenience over security, while selling an aura of technical superiority. Which is the modus operandi that worked for the distro author in the past, when he sold VPS with a big markup, because he also gave a
45.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
anyone knows how Jwz solution is working? dont click next link because he will show a nutsack image if the referrer contains hackernews. love the guy. www.jwz.org/blog/2025/01/exterminate-all-rational-ai-scrapers/ b
46.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
so true. the article authors wishing crawlers will use git instead is so funny because the crawlers don't care at all. they are scrapping everything with brute force. they don't care about your content or effective alternatives, a
47.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
do not fall for cloudflare marketing. they have one of the worst bot detection in the industry. but because everyone uses them, their huge false positive numbers won't show up anywhere.
48.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
you're replying to someone who says "far left" of they don't display open hatred for non cis people etc
49.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
it's very much the same and backed a political party at their home turf. tpb.party
50.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
to do what?
51.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
did you even read the article? you're wrong on all points.
52.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
right. that's my point. why if they try to guess your password and end up wiping data, then magically you're guilty?
53.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
and how if this similar to how a duress password work? say breaking the lock burn the contents somehow, to prevent documents falling into thief's hands for the sake of the comparison.
54.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
What about the opposite? remove the tech from the hypotetical. Say you carry a valise with a lock. They ask for the key, you truthfully answer that you do not have with you. They burn the valise and lose all the contents. So, are you in jai
55.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
You're correct on the technology assessment. But you forget all development today is just searching for a template, copy pasting, changing some small things. And a smart-ish search engine can do all that.
56.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
all the optimistic pundits ignore the blatant second order consequence of this: the entire economy is pegged on this NOT being cheap! all the US economy is tied to video cards being used in lieu of gold. cost dropping 100x means the economy
57.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
it's called Instagram
58.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
flagged. this should be on showHN. pretty much an Advertisement
59.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
it's one regex. if you detect name, DoB, ssn, credit card, email... you remove it. done there's zero concern if you can associate N flights can only match one person when looked in aggregate, etc. it's mostly pro forma to pre
60.
▲
by
iririririr
2mo ago
"cookie sync" is the internal lingo
More ›