irickt

7 ms·

31.
by irickt 8mo ago
I think not "ideally" in any case. Rather "practically" could be banned, for what badness? It doesn't claim it was authored by humans. It is clearly the work product of human who transparently is using AI. The work
32.
by irickt 8mo ago
Read more carefully, critics. He's sharing a big ol' mixed metaphor for living. The world and your mind are vast. Your job is to narrow it down to exactly your life. You are your own author.
33.
by irickt 9mo ago
What do the columns represent?
34.
by irickt 9mo ago
Details: https://teadrinker.net/spine/
35.
by irickt 11mo ago
Here's a better article about the watch itself: https://watchesbysjx.com/2025/10/j-player-supercomplication-...
36.
by irickt 1y ago
Dennett, Darwins Dangerous Idea, p448 ... No wonder Penrose has his doubts about the algorithmic nature of natural selection. If it were, truly, just an algorithmic process at all levels, all its products should be algorithmic as well. So f
37.
by irickt 1y ago
Jacob Bronowski expressed this with a more fundamental hypothesis. Humans have "a sense of the future" whereas other animals have very limited foresight.
38.
by irickt 1y ago
If the labours of Men of science should ever create any material revolution, direct or indirect, in our condition, and in the impressions which we habitually receive, the Poet will sleep then no more than at present; he will be ready to fol
39.
by irickt 1y ago
Tandy Armatron Dissection http://www.starborneworks.com/?p=22
40.
by irickt 2y ago
You are trying way too hard, whatever your motive. A world without Caesars is the ideal of all distributed systems. To become the anti-Caesar perhaps.
41.
by irickt 2y ago
Tangential cultural reference ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Tron_characters#Master_Control_Program The Master Control Program (MCP) ... is the main digital antagonist of the first Tron film.
42.
by irickt 2y ago
Daniel Dennett thoroughly debunks Penrose' argument in Chapter 15 of Darwin's Dangerous Idea. Quoting reviewers of a Penrose paper ... "quite fallacious," "wrong," "lethal flaw" and "inexplicable
43.
by irickt 7y ago
It's an uncanny valley of food. It tries so hard to simulate meat that it emphasizes its fakeness. Personally I prefer a simple vegetable patty that's not trying to be what it is not.
44.
by irickt 8y ago
source: https://github.com/linkeddata/dokieli
45.
by irickt 8y ago
Luxi Mono, monospaced with serifs, very readable for code and text. https://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/Luxi-Mono
46.
by irickt 8y ago
Consider the Lick Observatory. Just be sure to drive carefully.
47.
by irickt 8y ago
Saw this catalog of tools somewhere on HN just yesterday: https://remotehabits.com/tools/
48.
by irickt 8y ago
As linked in that article, here the Print Gallery has been un-transformed and animated: http://escherdroste.math.leidenuniv.nl/
49.
by irickt 8y ago
repo at https://github.com/playgrdstar/natureofcode_threejs
50.
by irickt 8y ago
Here's one of their online resources for helping learners think about thinking: http://www.visiblethinkingpz.org/VisibleThinking_html_files/...
51.
by irickt 8y ago
Yes, installed smoothly, seems faster. For example, time until the camera is up by swiping right on the lock screen is 2-3 seconds instead of roughly 6-8 seconds.
52.
by irickt 8y ago
It's a fact of language. A noun is a container for a thing or concept that gives us a handle on experience.
53.
by irickt 8y ago
Perhaps you are thinking of The Door Into Summer: "In Robert Heinlen's The Door Into Summer, Dr. Twitchell recounts a tale of a student whom he displaced in time by 500 years. While there was no way of knowing whether the student
54.
by irickt 8y ago
Over a few decades Scientific American has gone from deep research reports, to pop science, and now to untestable cosmic thinking and other clickbait. If it is not testable it is not scientific thinking. Philosphical thinking may also be gr
55.
by irickt 8y ago
Ugh. Has Scientific American become PseudoScientific American? Recently they published this https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/could-mult... by an author who believes ""There is only cosmic
56.
by irickt 8y ago
Good points. It all depends on the assumptions of the models. They said that the software is available but it's not in an obvious public place.
57.
by irickt 8y ago
This points to some interesting research but the title is clickbait. First, "artificial intelligence" is actually agent-based simulation. Second, the article barely mentions atheism, but if ones digs into the sources you find that
58.
by irickt 8y ago
Recent discussion about a tutorial and software: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17474949
59.
by irickt 8y ago
Visual Presentation of Statistical Concepts in Diagnostic Testing: The 2 × 2 Diagram, Kevin M. Johnson and Benjamin K. Johnson. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kevin_Johnson40/publica...
60.
Flora Robotica, Societies of Symbiotic Robot-Plant Bio-Hybrids(florarobotica.eu)
1 points by irickt 8y ago|0 comments

More ›