Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
irahul
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
117 ms
·
961.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
Had Google called it friend something, at least I won't have bothered. The only reason I am looking at it is because of brand Google. Granted that Google would have called it something else and I would have still used it, but that would be
962.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
For a web framework(non async run of the mill), I would say Flask has an edge. My Flask stack is: 1. SQLAlchemy for ORM. 2. Jinja2 for templates (flask default). 3. Flask for basic web framework functionality. 4. WTForm for forms. 5. Other
963.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
You can roll out your own or use one of the existing translators which translate from haml to jinja2 syntax. Do you use slim templates? I recently wrote a hand rolled recursive decent parser which translates slim to jinja2 - https://github
964.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
> under the guise of "helping connect people"... And the guise is working pretty well. It's really connecting people.
965.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
> Don't be rich, Live rich. Why not be rich and live rich. I get the "Live rich" part but that "Don't be rich" is unwarranted.
966.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
> Every single deal requires an opt-in from the business before it goes live. So no more reverse groupon? Will you be working with business owners now before offering a deal to users? If that's the case, that seems like the right thing
967.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
More like (afraid (very (are (we)))) or clojurish: (-> we are very afraid)
968.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
> girls/women less mind doing a task that doesn't directly benefit them. I don't follow. Are you saying documentation doesn't benefit the assignee directly and coding does? > Management often dictates that you ask others in your gro
969.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
> whereas women innately like to see a project successfully managed and will do what work is needed for the common goal? Just curious, does this "what work is needed for the common goal" extended to things which were complex compared to
970.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
You won't be needing underscore.js in coffeescript. Most of the underscore.js provides sequence abstractions and coffeescript does them out of the box. Things which aren't provided by coffeescript(and there aren't many) can be easily done i
971.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
I did a `npm install http-server`. It threw me a module not found error twice - once for `eyes` and once for `colors` I ran it on a directory and tested it with `ab -n 100 -c 5 localhost:8080/`. Concurrency Level: 5 Time take
972.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
> No, because their prior accomplishments speak for themselves. I just quoted examples where their prior accomplishments was public. There were many whose prior accomplishments are not public and were for their employers. > simply a
973.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
I know some very good developers who didn't do anything in their spare time. One of them was co-inventor of gif format, another was a core contributor to cygwin gdb and so on. But that was all before their day job. When they started their
974.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
> The fact that they are employees is a dead give away - if they are really talented, they would not be working for someone else I don't know much about FB employees but can assume there are really talented based on the amount of traffi
975.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
Not sure if you are being sarcastic, so I am taking it as you were serious. There are arguments both for and against taking a few months to do it yourself when someone could have done it in day. He invested his few months and now he has the
976.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
Google is one of the few companies who would invest in this sort of PR. It's good publicity for them and also an ultra creative way to garner people's curiosity and attention. It must have been a hell lot of work(unless I am missing somethi
977.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
How did you save the composition? I can't figure it out.
978.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
Except that here the walls of the walled garden aren't obvious. What's going to cost and what's free is very confusing. And in this case, it's not a walled garden per se. Apple is providing a storage service on its own terms. AppStore is mo
979.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
> If you carry out your business in a friendly and unique way you can win customers and do things that are very difficult to pull off otherwise. "cash only" seems unfriendly . You can get away with not being friendly as long as you are
980.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
Most likely your converted music goes away(music you didn't buy from iTunes) from the cloud storage. The music on your harddisk isn't going anywhere.
981.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
The OP's point was more about how confusing it is. We have an example right here - if 2 of you who did read the post aren't sure about the terms, how is Apple going to target its not-so-tech-savvy consumers? If someone gets charged for an u
982.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
But there isn't much to learn while parsing JSON. It nicely maps to high level languages. It does make your knowledge of XML useless, but it doesn't has the cognitive overhead of learning something which takes time and effort.
983.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
I looked at the source for goog/ui/serverchart.js and checked the documentation(yes, in that order:)). There is no way to make it work without going through the Google chartserver.
984.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
> You can run the charts through Google's closure locally It talks to google chart server. goog.ui.ServerChart.CHART_SERVER_URI = 'http://chart.apis.google.com/chart'; It won't work without talking to the server.
985.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
Among others, Norwig has said(on HN; can't find the thread but it was the thread about "Ask PG: Lisp vs Python") about close mapping between his pseudo code and Python code. Personally, I find it true.But I also find it true for Ruby, Cloju
986.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
> "have originated from long research into the most efficient or easily understood practices". Agreed. But judgement can't be passed on efficiency and/or clarity based on opinions of people who don't follow the trade. If we are talking
987.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
But ColdFusion didn't change much. And the abstractions it provides are generally frowned upon and ultimately, you need to learn what lies beneath. Doing that for Mathematics would be a bad idea. I can't find the reference but it was Feynma
988.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
> So in both cases, it'd be extremely useful. Assume all those surveyed say they don't like what they see in Mathematics at all - its all greek symbols and stuff. And then we do what? The current practices have originated from long rese
989.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
Interesting for sure but what purpose would it serve? Programming languages are meant for programmers. A survey of non-programmers on programming would be something on the lines of non-math people on math symbols.
990.
▲
by
irahul
15y ago
Hey people. Jinja2 http://jinja.pocoo.org/docs/ is a good general purpose templating engine. But Slim http://slim-lang.com/docs.html nailed it down with its clear syntax. I end up using Jinja2 a lot more often than slim - so I wrote a t
More ›