iotku

17 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by iotku 11y ago

   Seems to work pretty well for me, now only if I used non SSL sites more often. Go figure I find a solution to most of my issues I have with Sat around the time I'm moving somewhere with hopefully better internet soon.
2. 152.▲
   by iotku 12y ago

   Chromium: HTTPS 1.1: 140ms latency, 46.47s load time HTTPS 2: 25ms latency, 4.76s load time Definitely a difference on a high latency (Sat) connection, although I'm not aware what the latency amount is based on.
3. 153.▲
   by iotku 12y ago

   Ran this a while ago on my Satellite connection [1], it's really exciting for users with high latency. Satellite internet services have come a long way from what it used to be and has a much higher raw speed than before, but of course
4. 154.▲
   by iotku 12y ago

   In the 5 Years I have used Arch (Generally with testing repo enabled) I've only had one breakage (where as I couldn't boot) I can think of that wasn't my fault. (Issue with radeon power management) As long as you use pacman p
5. 155.▲
   by iotku 12y ago

   "puush.daemon.exe" seems to be the executable to look out for [1] if you've been running Puush. Possibly in either %appdata%\puush or C:\Program Files (x86)\puush [1] https://twitter.com/puushme/status&#x