ionised

42 ms·

421.
by ionised 8y ago
Yes.
422.
by ionised 8y ago
Imagine that sentence coming from a wannabe doctor or civil engineer.
423.
by ionised 8y ago
You're privacy paranoid but work at Google?
424.
by ionised 8y ago
This author sounds like he would be a poison pill on any team. We recently managed to get rid of someone that wasa this sure of himself that he had the impression that he carried the team. While his technical skill was sound (though no bett
425.
by ionised 8y ago
Not a million miles away from where we are now.
426.
by ionised 8y ago
> China Internet is not free and open. Then Google should have nothing to do with it. Otherwise they are not supportive of 'a free and open internet', but are actively supporting a close, censored and controlled internet. It&#x
427.
by ionised 8y ago
Not for sure no, but the signs are all there.
428.
by ionised 8y ago
> Lots of comments of how innocent China is being hard done by, really have a look at what China has done to exploit developing nations Those is glass houses...
429.
by ionised 8y ago
You cared enough to post about it.
430.
by ionised 8y ago
The alternative is no regulation, which I can't see ending up as anything other than a chaotic profit and power-seeking free-for all that does no favours for the average citizen that isn't part of the capitalist class.
431.
by ionised 8y ago
Tell them if they want to get up that early like you then they need to crank out some production-level code.
432.
by ionised 8y ago
It's already fully supported and encouraged by government and by religion, even when it doesn't make sense.
433.
by ionised 8y ago
And they still will, with different employers that hopefully have a better reputation for the treatment of their employees (and hopefully pay a fair tax contribution).
434.
by ionised 8y ago
Whoever was subject to EPA regulations clearly didn't want to be regulated, because the agency has been gutted during this administration. Regulation is not as black and white as you are painting. Plenty of regulations do good things,
435.
by ionised 8y ago
The US does it all the time. Why is okay when the US authorities shut down a site because of some bullshit DMCA violation that the rest of the world shouldn't be subject to?
436.
by ionised 8y ago
> True. But mostly due to anti-americanism. I'd love to see you prove this.
437.
by ionised 8y ago
Why would a rich right-winger criticise free markets? Surely they benefit most from it?
438.
by ionised 8y ago
GDPR isn't meant to protect business, it's meant to protect citizens from businesses.
439.
by ionised 8y ago
because, like most people on here, you talk about socialism without knowing the first thing about it, like an idealogue. If you're the product of the US education system then I can't really blame you. The the meanings of well-esta
440.
by ionised 8y ago
Or javascript.
441.
by ionised 8y ago
MOBA is the newer genre. It emerged out of a mod for an RTS game, Warcraft 3.
442.
by ionised 8y ago
Yeah, I definitely consider my right to industrial tribunal, paid time off, sick days, safety regulations and guaranteed maternity/paternity leave as defeats. Without all those things the unions fought for I might actually have a shot
443.
by ionised 8y ago
That depends entirely on the union. There are a multitude of ways to organise and run a union.
444.
by ionised 8y ago
Also consider the source. They are a libertarian think-tank.
445.
by ionised 8y ago
If this is how little trust you have in people then you probably shouldn't let anyone educate your children.
446.
by ionised 8y ago
> When you're a socialist, you don't believe people have any fundamental right to private property. Wrong. There is nothing in socialism that prohibits you from owning things.
447.
by ionised 8y ago
Propaganda can be positive or negative.
448.
by ionised 8y ago
Should we consider the anti-vax movment as a sign that all is not black and white with vaccines? Of course not. Just because people are still having the conversation it doesn't mean the conversation is worthwhile.
449.
by ionised 8y ago
Which is a shame, because they are both awful.
450.
by ionised 8y ago
Lets not pretend like the neoliberal ideologues that supported Pinochet in spite of his human rights atrocities simply because he was a capitalist aren't the exact same demographic that now stands by the Saudis becuase of their financi

More ›