intev

11 ms·

61.
by intev 5y ago
> k8 and spend a whole bunch of time on it. I fully agree and no one said that you should do it. But these days there's so many abstraction layers that it's not nearly as complicated as it was 2 years ago. 2 years ago I wouldn
62.
by intev 5y ago
> Really? You don't think speed of execution is far more important? Getting something to your users, validating assumptions and failing fast is also kinda important? IMHO using the latest tech is not. It is but not if you are using
63.
by intev 5y ago
That's from a birds eye view and is totally irrelevant to the current question. The state deployments are in right now, there's so many viable, and somewhat easily accessible options. Choosing one over the other is not different i
64.
by intev 5y ago
I think the whole point of this exercise is to find out where to draw the line in terms of abstracting out deployment steps and increasing deployment speed. The vast majority will agree that it is NOT at bash scripts. Once you get to a few
65.
by intev 5y ago
> And it matters how you divide it up. You could have a high ticket price and give away all the food for free but that big upfront payment would probably be off-putting for many even if they end up not paying more. For people who only wa
66.
by intev 5y ago
Take my Disney example. All what you said applies to that example too. Where does their revenue come if not from you? They could make entrance free and make money on what you buy inside. In fact, you can go further with this. You should not
67.
by intev 5y ago
This is such convoluted reasoning and you keep mentioning it. For example I could say: "I don't want to pay the road toll, I pay for it with the gas tax I pay" or "I don't want to pay for Disneyland, I pay for it wi
68.
by intev 5y ago
> Instead we'll just kill the extra children. Hyperbolic much? I agree there might be better ways but everything mentioned only has incentives and seems like a much lighter version of the Chinese policy.
69.
by intev 5y ago
Lol you got suckered in just like me again. They made it clear that nothing can convince them. It's like trying to convince a Christian to be Muslim. Nothing you say or do can change their view. It's incredibly frustrating because
70.
by intev 5y ago
> That's a convenient way not to engage with the actual arguments What actual "argument" did you put forth? You brought up tether and stablecoins, which is a pretty speculative argument. Nothing concrete is happening. The
71.
by intev 5y ago
> I know this is a common argumentative tactic to attempt to get people to change their mind. I don't know what would change my mind, but we're certainly not there yet as long as the risks which I cited still exist. This is a c
72.
by intev 5y ago
1) Seems like a random point to me. I agree with some stablecoins there are fishy things going on, and others not so much. But again I'm failing to see the relevance of this point. Also I'd like to point out, the SEC loves to go a
73.
by intev 5y ago
This is obviously false. "only", implying if at least one person used it for a legitimate reason that would make the statement false. There are plenty of legitimate businesses accepting bitcoin so it makes it false.
74.
by intev 5y ago
Since you seem to be arguing in good faith I'll engage; at which point will you accept that the value of BTC is > $0? It's coming up on a decade of showing seemingly limitless upside with the bottom constantly rising. The tulip
75.
by intev 5y ago
This makes no sense and in no way prepares them for the real world. Having a savings account where they can only put money in and can't easily withdraw from doesn't prepare them for the first job where they get paid in cash or cas
76.
by intev 5y ago
“the markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.”
77.
by intev 5y ago
I think it's a pretty safe assumption that if everyone started scraping with certain headers almost every website will blanket block those headers.
78.
by intev 5y ago
You are making this significantly more complicated than it has to be. Like I said, you and 1 or more people. If you work with other people you can call yourself a CEO. Doesn't matter if they're part time or what not. You still wor
79.
by intev 5y ago
He didn't say he didn't want to hire former entrepreneurs - you are saying that. He said don't be misleading about your previous position. If you say you are a CEO of a company I expect at least > 1, otherwise are you a
80.
by intev 5y ago
Even though it's a legal term it's incredibly misleading to say the least. It's like calling yourself a top 3 finisher in a race of 3 people. Sure you are technically correct, but also very misleading. CEO implies you are the
81.
by intev 5y ago
I know you're being sarcastic but you know what has happened? All these exchanges issued their own tokens that is backed by NOTHING and have their own tokenomics. One of the reasons people assigned value to those tokens was the more yo
82.
by intev 5y ago
HN is/has been very bearish on crypto in general.
83.
by intev 5y ago
I just compared their salaries on glassdoor. There seems to be quite a few data points. Their salary seems to be higher than Microsoft but lower than FB. Overall, comparable. Where are you getting this Coinbase is paying everyone "shit
84.
by intev 5y ago
Yea so your react native is dead argument is bs. You clarified it later saying you meant for complex projects but in another comment you claim that they're just a crypto dashboard. So which is it? Do they have a complex project (not a
85.
by intev 5y ago
> I'm not an app reviewer, I'm a techie. And sorry that I didn't sugarcoat it enough for your sensitive ears. What are you talking about? Why all this rage? In your previous reply you claim to innocently just talk about yo
86.
by intev 5y ago
LOL. So now my standards are not high enough? Everyone should program in C. Definitely one of the fastest. So we can all serve your highest standards.
87.
by intev 5y ago
I don't care that it's literally React. The react model doesn't work for every platform. I do know the subject. I'm no expert but I've lived long enough to know that one paradigm on one platform is not the solution
88.
by intev 5y ago
I never once said that their decision is impeccable. in fact I mentioned it probably has draw backs. What I did say was you don't have enough information about the decision making process and thoroughness. They cared enough to talk t
89.
by intev 5y ago
To show how popular the framework is and that it is not "dead". Also to sure that it is not universally hated. 57.9% loved is not as good as the 68.8% of Flutter but it's not a huge margin.
90.
by intev 5y ago
> Riiiight, and quickly followed by Xamarin and Cordova. Lol. I'm confused - is this meant to be a disbelief of the survey? "quickly followed by"? Are we seeing the same thing? Did you see the %s? It is significantly lower

More ›