intended

18 ms·

391.
by intended 6mo ago
AFAIK there are designs in the EU that respect privacy. There is a range of options being pushed around the world, and theres definitely a few of them which are more technically defensible than others.
392.
by intended 6mo ago
Gen Z is the first generation to score lower on standardized tests than previous generations. > https://fortune.com/2026/02/21/laptops-tablets-schools-gen-z...
393.
by intended 6mo ago
Yes? For example, you could least feel that the world is large enough to have people with other needs, drives and ownership levels of their work. You could also consider that this is not an even trade; artists had all their works ingested a
394.
by intended 6mo ago
At this stage there is just protest and reaction.
395.
by intended 6mo ago
It looks like a “People respond to incentives (prices)” situation. If something is cheaper than alternatives, spending patterns change. People subsidize corn or power and so consumers alter behavior to take advantage of those prices.
396.
by intended 6mo ago
> afaik most estimate north of 80% profit margins This seems to be the lynchpin of your argument. It makes me wonder if I have been living under a rock, because I have never heard of frontier labs making money. AFAIK all AI firms are sim
397.
by intended 6mo ago
The human speed legal system would become collateral damage.
398.
by intended 6mo ago
Hey, the more we think about our information economy/environment as a commons, the better. I fully expect our future to involve PhD factories where doctorates label AI output for the most competitive rates possible. The majority of us
399.
by intended 6mo ago
> The details change, but the fundamental playbook - using state violence to coerce outcomes favorable to said state - is far from new. Hell, There is a massive difference in degree and kind here. Mixing them up at this level is spherica
400.
by intended 6mo ago
But… wait… what? Based on you what you say… why do you put money into an insurance system? It sounds like you want to make the most rational choice, but you are working off of a model of insurance that doesn’t make sense. The maximally effe
401.
by intended 6mo ago
What is this comment? Yes, society curtails behaviors? We wear helmets and seatbelts? Insurance is entirely about paying a small amount so that the costs of being on the wrong side of bad luck doesn’t pauper your citizenry. A single payer s
402.
by intended 6mo ago
If your government requires its people to be dead, it is by nature a foul and evil thing.
403.
by intended 6mo ago
It feels like we got hosed once we got social media + ad tech. > No teachers or doctors have been saying this is good, they’ve been warning it’s worse than we think consistently. Thank you! I feel like I must be yelling into a void with
404.
by intended 6mo ago
I’ve read court opinions from the Indian Supreme Court that reference decisions in other nations. The OSA and DSA came out relatively close to each other. The rollout and follow up has been organic, with many nations are still at the wait a
405.
by intended 6mo ago
Tech work underinvests in customer support and safety. If they spent what they had to, they would crater their revenues, because support does not scale like code does.
406.
by intended 6mo ago
> The evidence is the highly abnormal behavior. The alignment of interests is a red herring. This is labelling the behavior as abnormal, and then basing your conclusions on it. Are you unaware that there’s been decades of reporting on so
407.
by intended 6mo ago
When it rains, disparate actors take out umbrellas.
408.
by intended 6mo ago
It passes the sniff test, it’s just that you weren’t informed or were aware of the build up of issues over the past decade. There’s known issues with bullying, grooming, to mental hygiene issues like screen addiction and poor focus. Hell, t
409.
by intended 6mo ago
This is only a few countries. There’s many more considering it.
410.
by intended 6mo ago
> Are there organic movements in Germany, UK, USA, Norway etc of common citizens agitating for social media controls for kids? Are they actually composed of citizens? Are they funded by grassroots organizations? Yes? Dear God, people hav
411.
by intended 6mo ago
I am tech policy adjacent, and HN is WILDLY off base when it comes to how the average voter is thinking about tech currently. Yes, all major nations have been looking at this since Australia started with it. There’s been a build up of force
412.
by intended 6mo ago
If we are talking hypotheticals, then why not just assume he wins a lottery? That’s Easier than assuming they can venture into startup land?
413.
by intended 6mo ago
This was a great article. I particularly like that it even identified English speaking nations as a cohort. There is no particular reason my personal preferences matter, but I have had a nagging feeling that all English speaking nations hav
414.
by intended 6mo ago
Striving without meaning being unhealthy is always true. As per the article, for some reason, Americans became unhappy across all groupings, post 2020. Its possible that some sub groups of people learned that work from home gave them more m
415.
by intended 6mo ago
I mean that > inherent to the technology Vs > inherent to the technology under capitalism The TLDR of my point is going to be that wealth concentration and information pollution sets up economies that don’t work for us in a manner tha
416.
by intended 6mo ago
> Unless a very strict line is maintained for privacy across the board; > many, many custom, tailor-made hells co-existing as tumors off of the back of state and corporate surveillance infrastructure. We already live in this world. Mo
417.
by intended 6mo ago
At this point, it feels like most technology will be used in favor of people with power, and not in a democratizing manner. I'd argue that this is something that is more about the state of play, than tech itself.
418.
by intended 6mo ago
>This sounds a direct abrogation of journalistic standards by the Ars editorial team. We depended on an ecosystem of news and journalism to keep our polities informed. However, if that ecosystem is starving it will increasingly fail to l
419.
by intended 6mo ago
> in danger It has already done so, and we can be confident in saying that. Verified content will always be relatively expensive when compared to AI content. Visits to wikipedia and most sites have dropped. Rtings has gone full paywall.
420.
by intended 6mo ago
Very insulated. Stanford released a report[1] in April, that shows a wide gap between AI Insiders and everyone else. > 5. AI experts and the U.S. public have very different perspectives on AI's future, except on elections and person

More ›