int0x80

8 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by int0x80 5y ago

   Technically the parsing itself and the grammar are the same, they don't depend on defined macros. Yes, defining a macro in an included file can make the resulting AST change, but the parsing algorithm doesn't really care about it
2. 32.▲
   by int0x80 5y ago

   Do you have an example of a language that parses different because of dependencies?
3. 33.▲
   by int0x80 6y ago

   Yes, a programming language being a user interface is a common analogy.
4. 34.▲
   Show HN: Small Lisp in Kotlin(github.com)

   7 points by int0x80 6y ago|0 comments
5. 35.▲
   by int0x80 7y ago

   That would be a false positive, if I am understanding things correctly. The warning is about code that is correct, yet it warns, hence false positive. If the warning was missing for incorrect code that would be a false negative. At least th
6. 36.▲
   by int0x80 7y ago

   How is this exposed to userspace? What interface?
7. 37.▲
   by int0x80 7y ago

   One argument is that allowing non-root to mount(2) is already a big security problem.
8. 38.▲
   by int0x80 7y ago

   I disagree. I found git checkout -b very convenient an intuitive way to say "create and checkout this branch". For git branch -c one could say that the "branch" command should not do checkout-business.
9. 39.▲
   by int0x80 7y ago

   Well, no. rm -rf / is a completely different beast. It is documented and expected for starters. They may have valid reasons to do that, even if not common.
10. 40.▲
    by int0x80 7y ago

    For example?
11. 41.▲
    by int0x80 7y ago

    Do you know why is that?
12. 42.▲
    by int0x80 7y ago

    I would hope it is not a new VM each time?
13. 43.▲
    by int0x80 7y ago

    thanks for the answer.
14. 44.▲
    by int0x80 7y ago

    thanks for the answer.
15. 45.▲
    by int0x80 7y ago

    Can you expand on that, please?
16. 46.▲
    by int0x80 7y ago

    That kind of rebase is just to refresh your work against updated masters etc. Of course you have to test against the refreshed (rebased) work again!! That doesn't mean you can't rebase. It means you can't randomly push untest
17. 47.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    I don't think it misses abstraction. It is covered under specialization costs.
18. 48.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    There is also a channel search feature in telegram web something. IIRC. E: like this https://tlgrm.eu/channels
19. 49.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Vodafone did also inject custom js/html in non HTTPS pages (obviously). This was 2 years ago.
20. 50.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    I think this is a very very interesting idea. The only problem that makes me nervous is telecoms/ISPs capping the line or requiring some propietary interface to it (something done this days to an extent) and quirks. If they feel they a
21. 51.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Thanks for the interesting and detailed info. I mean the cost of hitting the disk/socket. The actual IO. There is also the syscall overhead but that doesn't matter /that much/ with IO usually, in comparation with the act
22. 52.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    My point was that a malloc vs alloca in a full blown IO path, where you have sockets and posibly disk fsyncs is not all that significant, if at all. I understand that journald cares about performance. Micro-optimizations like malloc vs allo
23. 53.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    My bluetooth mouse (logitec) works very well. Never disconnects. But it does fail to properly suspend. I need to switch the BT off to suspend, because it will automatically restart the system when it is connected. I haven't searched fo
24. 54.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Another big question is why does it use alloca at all. Considering that it is well known in the C world to be problematic and discouraged. For this very reason. - Are you performance-constrained? NO. - Is calling malloc/free such a big
25. 55.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    There is xfs.org and the XFS mailing list. You can just send an email there. Maybe you were sending HTML emails or something that made the message bounce?
26. 56.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Something you can try: exercise. Really. Get tired. It may work for you too.
27. 57.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    This is hardware virtualization. Containers are OS "virtualization". They offer different levels of isolation and features.
28. 58.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Wow thats scary indeed... They where using x86 signed compare instead of unsigned (jg vs ja)... Thanks for the link btw!
29. 59.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Absolutely... adults don't/shouldn't play the blame game, just pointing out that in all fairness not everyone starts from the same point, but this is not really related to the main point beeing discussed anyway.
30. 60.▲
    by int0x80 8y ago

    Big problem here is the preprocessor as mentioned in the article.