inigyou

18 ms·

721.
by inigyou 2mo ago
> many people believe their streaming use will only pay artists who they listen to, not realizing the streaming service actually pays artists based upon overall listener numbers Those are the same thing
722.
by inigyou 2mo ago
FYI you aren't supposed to use an OS-specific header type, since you aren't the OS. No one can stop you, of course, and since there isn't an application-reserved range, you had to pick someone's reserved range.
723.
by inigyou 2mo ago
The nitter software still works and so do most of the servers except the most popular 2
724.
by inigyou 2mo ago
The internet isn't an append-only archive. It changes quite frequently in fact. Sorry dawg.
725.
by inigyou 2mo ago
Decency is politics
726.
by inigyou 2mo ago
So far everything they're doing is working out how they said it would
727.
by inigyou 2mo ago
Only if you own the camera system, otherwise they won't publish the video of you doing good
728.
by inigyou 2mo ago
Yeah I think I was shown one in about 2010. A metal sintering rapid prototyping machine, I think. The RepRap was also pretty new at that time, and of course they didn't have one at that professional facility because why would they?
729.
by inigyou 2mo ago
They will lose their jobs no matter what you buy, because that's not up to you, but up to billionaires
730.
by inigyou 2mo ago
No "intelligence" required
731.
by inigyou 2mo ago
The fact that you can sell a product that doesn't work and become a billionaire proves capitalism is broken.
732.
by inigyou 2mo ago
I can't see this because I don't have an Instagram account
733.
by inigyou 2mo ago
It doesn't really matter what you want though, only what CEOs want and that's low costs. I can see a combined shirt folding/traffic merging platform taking off.
734.
by inigyou 2mo ago
DOGE killing a few million people is no secret.
735.
by inigyou 2mo ago
When what they said is that Nazis are bad... literally yes? Literally everyone who disagrees with "Nazis are bad" is literally a nazi.
736.
by inigyou 2mo ago
I mean, that basically is how the Nazis had power
737.
by inigyou 2mo ago
A fig leaf
738.
by inigyou 2mo ago
The number of people who do this is the number of reasons Elon can give to the trademark judge that he is actually using the trademark Twitter and it shouldn't be invalidated for non-use.
739.
by inigyou 2mo ago
Why don't you do it?
740.
by inigyou 2mo ago
Probably just fetches the page with a login cookie, like Nitter.
741.
by inigyou 2mo ago
New account, -2 karma, mostly posts about how evil immigrants are
742.
by inigyou 2mo ago
Most of these front ends need to be stocked with login cookies, that's how they bypass the login wall. If you want to self host a bypass you need to create at least one dummy account on that service.
743.
by inigyou 2mo ago
It's impossible to build a foobar equivalent unless it's literally foobar, because the value of foobar isn't the software, but the fact that other people post stuff there. There's no point having a restaurant menu platfo
744.
by inigyou 2mo ago
Because it's not a real platform, it's a series of tiny microplatforms
745.
by inigyou 2mo ago
You can just ignore a C&D if you have the balls to enrage Elon
746.
by inigyou 2mo ago
First off I think you mean trademark, secondly you're allowed to just ignore a C&D, thirdly your trademark is invalid if you don't use it so Elon might not actually have a trademark on Twitter any more
747.
by inigyou 2mo ago
Violating ToS is legal, but so is sending a C&D for anything you like
748.
by inigyou 2mo ago
C&D has zero legal weight. They're just relying on developers being conflict-averse. At my local hacker space, at least five members are in some kinds of protracted legal battles (five different ones)
749.
by inigyou 2mo ago
No, and nitter the software still works too. Apparently the only barrier he could create was a cease and desist letter.
750.
by inigyou 2mo ago
Thanks, new account that only posts to support Musk

More ›