Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
informal007
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
121.
▲
by
informal007
3y ago
Telegram need that too
122.
▲
Is there a Reddit alternative that is a Web3 product?
1 points
by
informal007
3y ago
|
0 comments
123.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
This is a very good idea to research ChatGPT if open ai open the method that how to make ChatGPT.
124.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
May be all neural network are build base on statistic routain, But we can't enumerate all word like 010 in computer, so we compress the data. neural network is like the combine statistic routain and compress base large amount of data.
125.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
I think controllability is one of the problems
126.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
Generally, only train the dense network.
127.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
Little question, Why isn’t the total 100 percent?
128.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
Great idea! I think ten problem is too much for me, 2-5 is more suitable for me. One of my problems is that, is big model the direction of Strong Artificia intelligence (Artificial general intelligence) ? text-to-picture and text-to-video
129.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
It's so clean like Apple Store but more cheap.
130.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
Is this Steve Jobs's word?
131.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
Layoffs are not necessarily your own fault, after all steve jobs was laied off by his company ever.
132.
▲
Is there any small and interesting research directions of NLP recommended?
1 points
by
informal007
4y ago
|
0 comments
133.
▲
Will there be a text-to-video model soon after Imagen of Google?
1 points
by
informal007
4y ago
|
0 comments
134.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
Good news!!!
135.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
We can't have both speciality and generality. let's choose speciality.
136.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
It depends on people, some people can get more information from document than others.
137.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
Many people get more attention from diffchecker than New Twitter TOS
138.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
I get it from (this blog)[ https://alexanderell.is/posts/numbers-game/ ], Thanks very much still!
139.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
sorry, I still can't get it... > Yes, the pair (2,9) sums to 11, but the product is unique, and if Peter had been given the product 18 to begin with, he would have immediately known the answer. pair (2,9) and pair (3,6) can produce
140.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
>So Sandy knows the answer isn't (5,5). Similarly, she knows it's not (2,8) or (3,7). Why is not (2,8)? both pair (2, 8) and pair (4, 4) can produce a product of 16. Thanks anyway!
141.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
>since he doesn't it rules out pairs like (7x11) = 77 and (2x53) = 106. I think pair (7x11)=77 can't be rule out, because pair (1x77) is also equal 77. still don't got it... Can you explain the situation for 3 turns before
142.
▲
by
informal007
4y ago
AIGC is great!
143.
▲
by
informal007
5y ago
Agree
144.
▲
by
informal007
5y ago
Except you like your work
145.
▲
by
informal007
5y ago
Great