ineedasername

8 ms·

61.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
That linked article says its about RLVR but then goes on to conflate other RL with it, and doesn't address much in the way of the core thinking that was in the paper they were partially responding to that had been published a month ear
62.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
Pithy. But a made up quote by Tytler, he never said or wrote that. Tyler expressed some skepticism of Democracies but nothing like this. The too on-the-nose nature of this often passed along bit of propaganda should also be the giveaway tha
63.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
so… choices, as you see them in this issue, the lenses through which on the one hand you think is extreme and the other appropriate… are either screens-as-drugs or sports fishing? Some middle ground might be there somewhere. But if forced t
64.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
There were no uncomfortable truths there about code agents, save one of the 4 points which was that maybe they sometimes get prompt injected if you let them search for things online and don't pay attention to where they search and the
65.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
Good luck getting the average person through the setup process AI is part of the problem with what MS has shoved in to things but it may be part of what can help with the underlying issue of this behavior by corporations. The average user
66.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
>“Primary” function If that was the intent don’t you think it would be stated somewhere, or in the faq? > “Talking” past It’s only text, there’s no talking past. You can’t talk past someone when the conversation isn’t spoken. At best
67.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
>That seems worth testing I have-- I see your info via your HN profile. If I have a spare moment this weekend I'll reach out there, I'll dig up a few examples and take screenshots. I built an exploration tool for investigatin
68.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
>sufficient as a primary control. My apologies, it wasn’t my intent to convey that as a primary. It isn’t one. It’s simply the first thing you should do, apart from vetting your documents as much as practicality allows, to at least sta
69.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
I took that to be what it was intended it convey, and what Dimon wanted people to feel about what he said. That maybe they should poke around their own books but he wasn’t telling people “well ‘08 all over again” My own read of the subtex
70.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
Last year Jamie Dimon said there were some going to be some “cockroaches” found lingering unattended to in lots of private credit portfolios— the implication at the time was not that it was systemic and deep, merely that various incentives
71.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
Any document store where you haven’t meticulously vetted each document— forget about actual bad actors— runs this risk. A size org across many years generates a lot of things. Analysis that were correct at one point and not at another, thin
72.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
With respect to consumption, it’s pretty efficient vs older traditional servers, though I know workloads like that aren’t completely fungible. Nonetheless it bears keeping in mind that a single GB200 NVL72 rack provides 1.4 ExaFLOPS of AI
73.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
This article is setting up a bit of a moving target. Legal vs legitimate is at least only a single vague question to be defined but then the target changes to “socially legitimate” defined only indirectly by way of example, like aggressive
74.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
Hmmm… that may only work if they end up using the brick… maybe just send them donuts, corporate hq, stick a long stream of receipt paper in their with your own preferred use-based tos writing small font and faded ink.
75.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
Audiobooks are a good way to not feel alone in your head.
76.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
I’m not counting only soldiers. I didn’t pull these estimates out of thin air they’re not hard to find so I’m not going to take my time. I’ll say this: the difference isn’t small around this general question, hospitals don’t get bombed ever
77.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
"just spec out something else in the meantime" Yeah, I've learned that if I do too much of that I'll spend more time catching up in terms of consolidating gains through review of code and functionality. That's just
78.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
"how to fill the minutes that AI takes to write code" I usually review the code that's been written. Sometimes directly, sometimes by telling claude to bring things up piece by piece to explain choices as I review. Or I kick
79.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
60 is relevant because it's inherent to the point they are making in having experienced something that inherently requires having lived through a longer period of time. Its not uncommon for people to lose interest or find the passion h
80.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
Or just engage with whatever it is a post or article has written, at least if provenance isn't relevant to action you'd take on it. Within humans I don't think, for every interaction with the any form of output, "Well, d
81.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
No, incorrect. You're conflating "People injured died much more often" with other outcomes. Survivors in past times were often more commonly crippled in more severed ways, even when the initiating injury was minor. At those t
82.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
No, you are mistaken, inconsistent. Analysis cannot be X in ~1900's vs. x + y these days -> "Oh wow things have changed". Do you think "would not have died if there hadn't been an armed conflict" wasn&#x
83.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
“Maybe there’s a pattern here” Is is that surprisingly few weapons inventors expressed regret and doubt? Or just that very few wrote about it? Snark aside, we have massively more people alive today than in 1900 and yet the proportion of peo
84.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
It’s less worry to me given that a year ago this would have been exceptionally harder to do, requiring a lot more time and effort and been more costly. A year from now it will be even easier. All of this means that one aspect of the mission
85.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
“Too self-important” There is a little something self important about the type of person that performs the role of defending forums and sub reddits from unknowingly reading something written by an AI, and so concerned that some other person
86.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
Some day we'll all just go back to dismissing things immediately because they contradict our worldview instead of its potential author. And the everyday troll, seeing a less than perfect word choice or awkward turn of phrase will drop
87.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
You need the tension between both, or else either approach at most levels of systems, whether its an app or a corporation, tends to lead to toxic failures modes. It could be something overbuilt, large organization structures. Brittle soluti
88.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
Routing? Why route? the link at the point of comms is direct. There's no extra ground station, unless you mean the person/people doing things. But either they're communicating direct to a DC on the ground, or one in space, or
89.
by ineedasername 7mo ago
Oh no, how will people signal that some functionality or product in general is what they'd previously been referring as Mircolosp? er, Microsolps. wait, that's not it either, Macroslop. Micro$lop. Microsplo. Sorry, so many typos!
90.
by ineedasername 8mo ago
A PhD generating knowledge has a cumulative effect that an equivalent intelligence generating prose purely for entertainment does not. And a whole bunch of that work isn’t really about novel insights, it’s about filling in gaps and doing kn

More ›