ilyt

41 ms·

751.
by ilyt 3y ago
It would be strength/brick use tradeoff. I want to know how that compares to just adding some rebar along the way
752.
by ilyt 3y ago
Take a piece of paper. Try to put it on its edge. Now bend the paper in zigzag and try again
753.
by ilyt 3y ago
and like 5x the space
754.
by ilyt 3y ago
At cost of like 5x the space ? I guess if you have cheap land but bricks are at premium it makes sense
755.
by ilyt 3y ago
that has nothing to do with any single of those tools, just the fact of trying to manage firewall by more than one tool at once. Netplan technically could solve it but I have zero trust in Ubuntu not fucking it up or abandoning it in few ye
756.
by ilyt 3y ago
ebtables can, it inspects ethernet frames.
757.
by ilyt 3y ago
You could probably via ebtables as they inspect ethernet frames directly. That can be used for example to not allow VMs on host to spoof mac addresses. But easiest way is just don't allow app to run with permission to access raw socket
758.
by ilyt 3y ago
It's the fact that TCP/UDP socket interface doesn't expose macaddress, dnsmasq IIRC does the same
759.
by ilyt 3y ago
Not really. Just ufw wasn't made to deal with it.
760.
by ilyt 3y ago
It's probably ufw putting its rules in INPUT and OUTPUT chain and docker needing them in FORWARD. Don't blame ufw incompetence on iptables. There is separate issue with bridging aptly described here https://wiki.libvirt
761.
by ilyt 3y ago
I envy job where you think a database is something fancy and hard to do...
762.
by ilyt 3y ago
I'm renting $15/mo 2TB atom machine from OVH/kimsufi as second target for backups. Now that I think about it... some kind of micro-distributed backup server (throw on few of your machines, auto-replicate between) would be a n
763.
by ilyt 3y ago
How tarsnap keeps backups readonly ? Just having service being a barrier is not enough
764.
by ilyt 3y ago
> notice that while there was an outage, part of the reason for it taking a while was a conscious choice to take a much longer path to resolution than bringing up the previous server in the name of paranoia. Paranoia about data corruptio
765.
by ilyt 3y ago
That if there was zero other options that offer encrypted backups, but other software offers that too. Many also offer deduplication. And deduplication is less of a needed feature if you dont pay thru the nose for GB
766.
by ilyt 3y ago
To be fair , any backup service should probably best have model of "pay per length of backup stored". If I want to store my 100GB of data now , and I want to have it stored for a year, I want to pay for that year's worth of
767.
by ilyt 3y ago
You can send your backups to backblaze and S3 and it still would be cheaper
768.
by ilyt 3y ago
> If tarsnap is built on top of s3, they're charging 10 times for the storage cost. Easy money from the uninformed? That's pretty much any SaaS... look at the various log or metrics gathering solution, where you pay serious mul
769.
by ilyt 3y ago
The "fancy" option here is trying to act S3 to act like database instead of simple blob storage...
770.
by ilyt 3y ago
The "problem" is that no sane company will sign for any damage compensation on some cheapo few dollars a month service.
771.
by ilyt 3y ago
The stuff I don't want to fuck around searching re-downloading from torrent for example.
772.
by ilyt 3y ago
I could see it working if there was also just a pin button on window that made WM remember where it should be after being started again
773.
by ilyt 3y ago
Sometimes customer wants containers; most of our (ops/orchestration) runs outside of container but containerising it (for same reason, one static blob) is easy But the code I nicked the example from was actually our internal k8s/d
774.
by ilyt 3y ago
That's the beauty! The build process is exactly the same for in and out of container stuff. In both cases result is either binary or binary + static files (nowadays, as it is mostly ops stuff, binary gets embedded static files). It&#x2
775.
by ilyt 3y ago
I just resize terminal when(~5% of the time) that's needed; long lines are hard to read without wrap on even 24 inch full size terminal, let alone anything longer
776.
by ilyt 3y ago
rofi -show window will give you searchable list of open windows. I bound it under alt+tab. No icons tho
777.
by ilyt 3y ago
I do all that (well, similar enough stuff). I just have virtual-desktop-per-app (or pair of apps and switch between them <super>+1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8 for left-side windows, <super>+F1/2/3&
778.
by ilyt 3y ago
Is there any showcase that shows actual work rather than: * changing wallpapers * changing music * changing mouse cursor speed settings (why is that even in quick accessible panels, I've set it once 10 years ago and haven't change
779.
by ilyt 3y ago
Nah, if that was the case it might've been actually decent...
780.
by ilyt 3y ago
I have similar setup. One improvement that I really liked (for those few times where I don't use the usual map) is that rofi have alt+tab search in window titles which helps massively to find any temporary app or terminal I might'

More ›