illumen

42 ms·

361.
by illumen 12y ago
Marketing told you it is hard? Or did you try it?
362.
by illumen 12y ago
It's not just an ad hominem attack. I counter a number of his claims. The author provides NO evidence for any of the rubbish he's talking about.
363.
by illumen 12y ago
Numpy works really nicely on python 3. Numpy was ported to python3 years ago. It was one of the first libraries who rolled up their sleeves and did the work for the good of the python community. I even helped with this, so I know first ha
364.
by illumen 12y ago
I doubt the lazy people who haven't moved to python3 will ever do a decent port of python 2. Python3 has been out for over six years now, with warning before that. I'd much rather bet on the python developers who are shipping sof
365.
by illumen 12y ago
So you can write in Haxe, and then use it in your python projects.
366.
by illumen 12y ago
Lots of crashes here too. In the graphics driver.
367.
by illumen 12y ago
I <3 Tokyo :)
368.
by illumen 12y ago
Just move inside a rack. There's a lot of buzzing noise, but it's cold, dark, and there's good internet access.
369.
by illumen 12y ago
Indeed! pysonar2 uses them with success.
370.
Statically checking Python(renesd.blogspot.com)
9 points by illumen 12y ago|0 comments
371.
by illumen 12y ago
I recently wrote this post "statically type checking python" http://renesd.blogspot.de/2014/05/statically-checking-python... Turns out with modern tools you _can_ statically type check python :)
372.
How to statically type check python(renesd.blogspot.com)
3 points by illumen 12y ago|0 comments
373.
by illumen 12y ago
Launching kernels on device is nice. The competition has real time ray-tracing on mobile.
374.
by illumen 12y ago
'And yet, statically typed languages can still be checked for a lot more things.' What is your evidence? Can you provide a citation? Modern tools can statically check python for a lot of things. Here are some things you can stati
375.
by illumen 12y ago
Do you have any specific publicity available code which you claim is too slow in python? Otherwise, I don't believe you. For example, hg is now faster than git. Git is written by great C hackers (including Linus no less), and yet hg
376.
by illumen 12y ago
Yet, numpy exists for python, so why can't you use it in a comparison? Why can't you use libraries for languages? The python approach is all about gluing bits together, not staying within a pure walled garden. Also, python is no
377.
by illumen 12y ago
Cheap gigabit internet for all?
378.
by illumen 13y ago
The e-commerce shop sold to yahoo in 1998 by pg. The guy who made this website. [0] Ebay was also doing lots of business in the 90s. Paypal was founded in 1998, and it wasn't the first e-commerce company by far. [1] Perl, php, TCL
379.
by illumen 13y ago
Marketing is not evidence. Stop making stuff up. Mods: Please delete my account. I'm done.
380.
by illumen 13y ago
"Because they are more often used for scripting then anything else. Let's not add political correctness to programming." Citation? You're just making stuff up.
381.
by illumen 13y ago
Pretty much his entire list is wrong. "Deploying a commercial website ten years ago required significant upfront capital" Actually... you could get a very large website up 10 years ago on almost nothing. $30/month dedicated
382.
by illumen 13y ago
Really? Just move to 3 already! :) I don't think it's entirely fair to call people who don't upgrade lazy or scared. However, it's really not that hard at all these days. Most packages are ported, and there are many s
383.
by illumen 13y ago
You're welcome to a refund.
384.
by illumen 13y ago
There's this hackership thing in Berlin as well... http://www.hackership.org/
385.
by illumen 13y ago
"these days most of GNU/Linux is written by Red Hat employees directly, who essentially work for the US military (their largest customer)" Is that true? Really? They write most of the packages? Or they write most of the sy
386.
by illumen 13y ago
"I just reviewed all open and closed bugs in TextSecure's Issues page and didn't see a single crypto protocol bug. Admittedly, I looked quickly and casually. Could you point us to one?" You could not have reviewed all op
387.
by illumen 13y ago
No need for an of audit TextSecure... just go to their github issues page. Plenty of open bugs and regressions, some of them as serious as some of the ones in the latest CryptoCat app audits. For example, one issue where some messages sen
388.
by illumen 13y ago
More and more desktops have touch screens now. For the last couple of years this has been a trend. Also, some desktop OS's support touch quite well. So you better update your terminology, since desktop does touch. Whilst the new UI
389.
by illumen 13y ago
Modern browsers are hiding the url, and title more and more.
390.
by illumen 13y ago
co-working spaces

More ›