Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
igrigorik
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
12 ms
·
91.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
Effectively, you're describing socket pooling and re-use.. across sessions / tabs / windows. Most browsers already have this in place. :) Some details on Chrome implementation here: http://www.igvita.com/posa&
92.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
The goals section in the design doc provides a high-level comparison (and motivation behind "why QUIC"): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RNHkx_VvKWyWg6Lr8SZ-saqs...
93.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
TCP is not going away anytime soon... If anything, the hope is that QUIC can help improve TCP in the long run -- but first, we need to validate a lot of the design assumptions. :)
94.
▲
Experimenting with QUIC
(blog.chromium.org)
102 points
by
igrigorik
13y ago
|
13 comments
95.
▲
Innovating with HTTP 2.0 Server Push
(igvita.com)
9 points
by
igrigorik
13y ago
|
0 comments
96.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
A comparison of the different hints, and which browsers support them: http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1230000000545/ch10.htm...
97.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
I'm not even sure what side effects "display: none" would have here.. But that's beside the point. The point of prerendering is to to deliver an instant "swap" of the prerendered tab when the user navigates to that page - think of it as a h
98.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
Yep, that's how it's implemented.
99.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
You can see if pre-rendering is being triggered in chrome://net-internals#prerendering. See: http://www.igvita.com/posa/high-performance-networking-in-go... And "yes": https://www.evernote.com/shard/s1/sh/0f3592b8-d72c-40f7-9bbf...
100.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
Correct on both counts.. Pre-fetching DNS names for origins not on the page is, indeed, a nice use case - redirects are a good example. Similarly, embedding a <link rel=dns-prefetch> in the head will trigger an early DNS lookup, whi
101.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1230000000545/ch10.htm... Scroll down for list of browsers (and versions) that support prefetch / prerender / and other hints.
102.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
Yep. Prefetch != prendering. Prefetch only fetches the single resource, and is meant as a "post load" hint. Whereas prerendering fetches the entire page, and all of its assets. http://chimera.labs.oreilly.com/books/1230000000545/ch10.htm..
103.
▲
Deploying WebP via Accept Content Negotiation
(igvita.com)
4 points
by
igrigorik
13y ago
|
0 comments
104.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
Yep, it'll concatenate files, minify them, etc., all the things you would expect. Perhaps the only caveat is: it doesn't do any dependency management, etc., which sprockets provides (if you actually use that part of it).
105.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
Yup, in fact, that's exactly how ZippyKid integration is setup: https://www.zippykid.com/2013/04/23/partnership-with-google-... It doesn't matter if the files are local or remote, ngx_pagespeed can fetch from both. Some docs on related fu
106.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
You can see the complete list of filters (40+) here: https://developers.google.com/speed/docs/mod_pagespeed/confi... Note that docs above are for mod_pagespeed (Apache), but all of the same filters are available in nginx port as well - it
107.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
Actually: https://chromiumcodereview.appspot.com/13814024 :-)
108.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
This is slightly orthogonal, but still worth mentioning: there is WebP codec available for Windows, which adds WebP support in explorer and all the other common tools. Download page: https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/download
109.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
We just landed "image/webp" in Accept header in Chrome, behind a flag.. Opera already advertises WebP support in their Accept header. So, with that in place, it should make things a lot simpler (although it doesn't solve the Save As case).
110.
▲
by
igrigorik
13y ago
A good discussion on this here: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!msg/chromiu...
111.
▲
Chrome DevTools can do THAT? Part II
(docs.google.com)
3 points
by
igrigorik
13y ago
|
1 comments
112.
▲
Say no to reimplementing the browser's parser in JavaScript
(plus.google.com)
1 points
by
igrigorik
14y ago
|
0 comments
113.
▲
by
igrigorik
14y ago
Yep, tips for where and how to engage with the project: http://www.chromium.org/blink#participating
114.
▲
HTTP 2.0 - draft 2
(tools.ietf.org)
2 points
by
igrigorik
14y ago
|
0 comments
115.
▲
by
igrigorik
14y ago
https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/blink
116.
▲
by
igrigorik
14y ago
cough web components cough
117.
▲
by
igrigorik
14y ago
Starting today new dev work will go into Blink repo. So, effectively, today.
118.
▲
by
igrigorik
14y ago
Not at all. iOS version uses UIWebView, but all the rest is Chrome code.
119.
▲
by
igrigorik
14y ago
Nope, no changes for Chrome for iOS: current version already uses UIWebView and will continue to do so. The rest of the infrastructure (networking, etc), is Chrome code.
120.
▲
Faster, smaller and more beautiful web with WebP
(igvita.com)
3 points
by
igrigorik
14y ago
|
0 comments
More ›