igravious

370 ms·

2761.
Diamond Go(segerman.org)
1 points by igravious 16y ago|0 comments
2762.
by igravious 16y ago
Excuse my ignorance: what do you mean by noisy?
2763.
by igravious 16y ago
brumby? now i know fo shizzle that y'all just yankin my chain...
2764.
by igravious 16y ago
The thing is alttab, aren't we meant to have gone past that stage in our historical development? You know, plundering and pillaging and what-not. The problem is that any legitimate exploitation of this mineral wealth is delegitimatized (God
2765.
by igravious 16y ago
I am Jack's complete lack of surprise at the down-votes. From the article: "An internal _Pentagon_ memo, for example, states that Afghanistan could become the “Saudi Arabia of lithium,”" and "“There is stunning potential here,” Gen. David H
2766.
by igravious 16y ago
A trillion dollars? Really? What a round figure. Wait a minute ... that reminds me of something that I read recently. Now, what was it? Oh yeah, it was this observation by Vijay Prashad over at CounterPunch. http://counterpunch.org/prashad
2767.
by igravious 16y ago
Oh no, another land rush for a name space yet again. Missed the domain name rush. Ditto the Twitter rush. And now this - Q: what's your worldoftext handle that you're homesteading for $8.99 a year? A: http://www.yourworldoftext.com/all_the
2768.
by igravious 16y ago
You know jhollingworth, nobody has put forward your analysis here or suggested (hushed voice - hypochondria - which could be related to what you describe). But, and please don't mod me down here, this person must a) be either _extremely_ un
2769.
by igravious 16y ago
so: prior art?!
2770.
by igravious 16y ago
Understood lionhearted, consider the fluff nixed forthwith. I have always been more drawn to virtue theory. I have of late been drawn to Wittgenstein's archly enigmatic, "aesthetics and ethics are one". I don't know if Wittgenstein ever sai
2771.
by igravious 16y ago
l;bra (long; but read anyway) Articulately put and yummy intellectual fodder. Thank you for the submission brazzy. Cancer and Obesity should always be "cancers" and "obesities" when we're talking about how we should treat the potential/actu
2772.
Compare Broadband Speeds Worldwide (or My Broadband Sux)(netindex.com)
4 points by igravious 16y ago|0 comments
2773.
by igravious 16y ago
When you're a parent yourself you'll understand why your Mom asks you the _same_ _boring_ questions everyday. Count yourself lucky that she cares and that's she's savvy enough to use IM :)
2774.
by igravious 16y ago
Your way is much simpler. I was building an AI to handle all my emails but it turned out to be a lot harder than I had originally envisioned.
2775.
by igravious 16y ago
Off-topic but meh. The guy is a frighteningly funny and shrewd to boot. See any of his posts at A Tiny Revolution http://www.tinyrevolution.com/mt/ Oh a thanks for the heads-up on this data structure ljlolel.
2776.
by igravious 17y ago
Hi there. You are absolutely right X-Istence. I wrote that in the heat of the moment, as they say. I have already retracted the blanket edict in my reply to compay. Consider it doubly-retracted. Of course, I respect everyone's right to expr
2777.
by igravious 17y ago
Point taken. That was my second attempt. (The first was far less civil.) I am still of the opinion that gdp's comment was far more mean-spirited than my rejoinder. Or if not mean-spirited then lacking in imagination or possessing a real dis
2778.
by igravious 17y ago
Yo. I would suggest that as an admitted non-fan of Ruby then you are in no position to comment. Besides, _why could draw, anyone could appreciate his stuff I'd imagine. He could play music. He had a quirky sense of humour, and was a creativ
2779.
by igravious 17y ago
Yo! Not only that but the obviousness of "and so on" is often elided. "And so on" assumes unbounded time and/or resources and also assumes you know intimately the (undoubtedly recursive) algorithm and can codify it. These proofs often blata