idnefju

8 ms·

31.
by idnefju 7y ago
OpenCL isn't in a good place. CUDA has become the industry standard.
32.
by idnefju 7y ago
Forking for whatever reason is in the spirit of open source. Asking if something is right is nonsense. From an ethical point of view, it follows the license of the project so there is no issue. If the author of the original source had an is
33.
by idnefju 7y ago
Of course it also depends on your pigmentation and where you live.
34.
by idnefju 7y ago
do you have any article links about your kind setup?
35.
by idnefju 7y ago
Had so much trouble trying to get a C++ project cmake setup with opencv 4 in macOS. Until I found conan. I have been use to package managers from other languages.
36.
by idnefju 7y ago
> I've been looking into Kafka lately, because I have a need for "the thing that Kafka is in practice" (not a message queue per se; rather, an indefinitely-durable event store that supports message-queuing API semantics fo
37.
by idnefju 7y ago
Is ES one of these necessary evils? I have been looking for a product similar to it, but it seems ES is always recommended.
38.
by idnefju 7y ago
And OCaml lacks features that F# has. Like proper multicore support, computation expressions, unit of measure, operator overloading.
39.
by idnefju 7y ago
I wouldn't compare it like that. Templates are more like meta-programming. Templates can achieve what you can do with Java generics, but they can also do a lot more.
40.
by idnefju 7y ago
Oh interesting view. It's funny since Scala's author himself doesn't consider the IO monad to be "pure". > “The IO monad does not make a function pure. It just makes it obvious that it’s impure.” https:/&#x
41.
by idnefju 7y ago
> It's a little known fact but the kind of FP programming we do in Scala tends to be more pure than what happens in OCaml, F#, Erlang, Clojure and others. What do you mean by pure exactly? IO Monad? Simply no side effects?
42.
by idnefju 7y ago
ad-hoc polymorphism is where it shines. Such as the typeclass in Haskell or modules in OCaml