Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
icholy
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
121.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
I just don't want to use source maps anymore ...
122.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
Please god no more...
123.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
In Go, it's common to create new types from the built-in ones. Here's an example: https://pkg.go.dev/net/http#Header When you create a new type like this, you lose all methods from the original type. If the d
124.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
I don't think I've ever heard Go described as having "pretty syntax".
125.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
That makes more sense. I haven't had any response to bug reports for x/text, the author is mia
126.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
It's because people started putting "always use strings.Compare" in their style guides.
127.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
I'm curious if changing the interviewers voice would have had an impact.
128.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
Write a DefaultFoo function which returns a Foo with default values set. Then unmarshal into that.
129.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
The go.mod is the dependency configuration file you're describing.
130.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
> Putting domain names in import statements is a massive mistake. Why do you say that? I appreciate the lack of indirection.
131.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
https://robpike.io/ivy@latest?go-get=1
132.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
Go look in a mirror for an example of simple
133.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
Interesting how some people are unfamiliar with how technology s-curves work.
134.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
At least it can correctly format a document created after 2003 ..
135.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
There's this https://github.com/settings/copilot
136.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
I'm glad to see this book get the attention it deserves.
137.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
What makes you think sync/atomic is undocumented? https://pkg.go.dev/sync/atomic
138.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
The content is mostly ok, but the title suggests that there's some obvious alternative to Go that we should be using. If he's implying it's Rust, then he's totally disconnected from reality.
139.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
No, I'm not sure why it's here.
140.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
> the 'accepted' process has changed 3 or 4 times in the last 2 years. No it hasn't.
141.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
I believe OP is being sarcastic.
142.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
It's like you didn't even read what I said...
143.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
Don't make T a pointer.
144.
▲
by
icholy
4y ago
The author of the blogpost has been making proposals for generics since Go 1.0 was released. Contrary to what some of the smooth-brains on here think, generics weren't implemented because of their incessant crying.
145.
▲
by
icholy
5y ago
let foo; try { foo = await is_this_better(); } catch (err) { console.log("if err != nil doesn't seem so bad all of a sudden"); }
146.
▲
by
icholy
5y ago
I believe he is an engineer.
147.
▲
by
icholy
5y ago
Why are you saying "only"? Are we looking at the same list?
148.
▲
by
icholy
5y ago
If you consider the adoption rate, it's pretty clear that the people who avoid Go because of <insert missing feature> are a vocal minority.
149.
▲
by
icholy
5y ago
People are upset that their favourite language didn't get as popular as Go.
150.
▲
by
icholy
5y ago
It's the TS team making the proposal.
More ›