Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
ibejoeb
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
10 ms
·
181.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
Woah. I've been looking around for months. That's huge. Thanks.
182.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
Got it. That makes more sense, i.e., that you're essentially required to use it rather than getting something in addition.
183.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
> We've convinced multiple banks to permit GrapheneOS, and that's going to become MUCH easier now. I did not know that. That is very interesting. On that topic, an honest question: what is the killer feature of banking apps tha
184.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
Ok. What does that have to do with archery?
185.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
Was there a recent archery incident?
186.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
I don't find any materials on ethnic prohibitions. There are a lot of problems with that. Among them, it would either fail to achieve the goal. For example, let's say there was a Turk born and raised in PRC and totally aligned wit
187.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
If you're talking about the president, no. Obama was the president in 2016.
188.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
Sounds like trolling, but the idea of Waymo suing a responder to a terrorist attack is too ridiculous.
189.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
Sure, there are valid scenarios. LA certainly has some terrible and legal vehicle crossings. (The fast, windy portion of beverly ranks.) I agree that it's hard to navigate without some cooperation. It's just that almost all of the
190.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
In that context, yes, there are certainly cases where making space is reasonable and legal, like stopping shy of side intersection while (traffic is stopped) to allow a turn. Stopping or altering traffic isn't, though. You shouldn'
191.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
That courtesy is almost always bad practice and is generally unlawful. You must yield right of way to a pedestrian at a legal crossing, but california has codes that prohibit impeding normal traffic flow, including stopping in the street to
192.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
The article only touches on `open` and `close` and doesn't deal with any of the realities of file access. Not a particularly compelling write-up.
193.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
Obviously it depends on what you're consuming, but popular sites are rarely static web pages. Safari suspends backgrounded tabs. I think that's what we're observing here rather than strictly memory pressure.
194.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
There's another point, too. Detractors say LLMs will never advance to whatever threshold they consider meaningful. Fine. We're working on other paradigms, too, though. Just because a lot of o people are productizing LLMs doesn
195.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
All true. There's also a perverse incentive in getting involved in LA. It's a major market where overly ambitious people go to make bigger names for themselves. Their goals are not aligned with operating the city; it's a step
196.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
>costs are spread over more people I'm suggesting that this isn't the actual answer. The thread started with the premise that the city doesn't have enough revenue, and that the way to increase that revenue is to bring in m
197.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
I'm not giving you a hard time. I'm saying that I made my choice. I'm going to stay in my home. I don't really think those are the only three choices, though. The government can fail and be replaced with a new one that w
198.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
I still don't get it though. Am I right that the proposition is: voluntarily accept a lower quality of life, or we'll either take your property or let it the neighborhood go to pot until you decide to give it up? People are not go
199.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
>The people living in SFH don't want to move exactly because they're not generating enough tax revenue to keep the city afloat So the kernel of the argument is that 1) someone bought a single-family home and based on ground tru
200.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
I worked on something like this in 2000-1. We were attempting to identify the native language and origin region of authors based on aberrant modes in second languages (as a simple case, a french person writing english might say "we are
201.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
And it diminishes search accuracy. You can publish a reasonable criticism, but if people don't see it, you're not changing minds.
202.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
That's pretty much over, too. PatronScan and others collect and share data as a first-class feature, e.g., to broadly 86 people. https://www.sacbee.com/food-drink/article231580393.html
203.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
>Thiel and his friends support the government snatching citizens off the streets What's the story here?
204.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
I do like that last part. Still, it would be difficult to have a contemporaneous conversation that way.
205.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
Isn't that just email then? I mean I guess you could wrap a bubbly UI around it, but you're not getting around the latency and spam. Those seem like dealbreakers to me.
206.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
>OSS will be sufficient for most businesses Only for well defined tasks. There's not really a practical upper bound. We will keep throwing more complex tasks at it to the extent that it can handle them. Like if you just need fancy O
207.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
(1) is true, but actually driving is definitely harder without hearing or with diminished hearing. And Several US states, including CA, prohibit inhibiting hearing while driving, e.g., by wearing a headset, earbuds, or earplugs.
208.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
Moreover, why draw a hard line on vision only when there is existing technology is available to augment it? It's not like they have to develop 3 novel technologies.
209.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
Maybe I'm giving GM too much credit, but it seems to me that GM acquired the technology with the intention to bring it into their vehicles as driver assistance, not autonomous driving. They were pretty candid about not wanting to opera
210.
▲
by
ibejoeb
8mo ago
My mistake. Despite that, I don't have much confidence that nest isn't also uploading everything at all times.
More ›