ibdknox

41 ms·

361.
by ibdknox 14y ago
(use 'clojure.repl) (doc map)
362.
by ibdknox 14y ago
you can just manually download that script if you need to at the url it uses: http://temp2.kodowa.com/playground/light.ps1
363.
by ibdknox 14y ago
actually I don't use any of that anymore. I'm using some hackery around the CLJS analyzer to make it all happen.
364.
by ibdknox 14y ago
Are you running the jar with prod as an arg? java -jar lighttable-full.jar prod
365.
by ibdknox 14y ago
A fair number of people were still on Snow Leopard (because Lion is a bit of a disaster), so we were very intentional about making that work.
366.
by ibdknox 14y ago
It's early and we honestly didn't think down those lines. Ultimately, the deployment mechanism will look different than this, but this was the path of least resistance. At the very least though we can do a few of these things to remove some
367.
by ibdknox 14y ago
To be fair, I added that after it got changed with the hope it might end up reverted :)
368.
by ibdknox 14y ago
I don't know, but it's starting to make me sad. It doesn't seem to fall under the "editorial spin" guidelines - if anything it was clarification. Hopefully the mystery will bring more people in? haha ;)
369.
by ibdknox 14y ago
it was compiled for java 6, but should run on 7.. I have no idea what's going on there.
370.
by ibdknox 14y ago
the parts that affect clojure have been changed a fair bit from the default theme.
371.
It's Playtime - Light Table Playground released(chris-granger.com)
384 points by ibdknox 14y ago|124 comments
372.
by ibdknox 14y ago
Thanks to everyone: http://www.chris-granger.com/2012/06/01/45-days-later/
373.
by ibdknox 14y ago
We showed examples that relate very cleanly to "normal coding", but what we ultimately want to see is exactly what you're describing. There are so many places where a thin veil over the implementation would be immensely useful, presenting n
374.
by ibdknox 14y ago
It will probably be under the GPL just like Emacs, so I'm not sure I understand the concern?
375.
by ibdknox 14y ago
look at my comment below.
376.
by ibdknox 14y ago
From the bottom of the post: "If you couple [DSTs] with the generalized editing capabilities I showed last time, you have what we believe to be the future of tools: an environment that you are able to mold to the exact shape of your problem
377.
by ibdknox 14y ago
Lisp is the extension language :) Everything so far is Clojure + ClojureScript with the language backends written in the language they support (python in python and so on)
378.
by ibdknox 14y ago
These were examples of extensions to make a point and not at all what we'll be focusing on. What we're making sure of is that the platform for such things exists and enables all of the things that old UI's and such don't allow. I think the
379.
by ibdknox 14y ago
It's still serializing to files - it has to, our workflows are entirely dependent on them :)
380.
by ibdknox 14y ago
Right now it goes at most one level deep into the call tree to prevent what you're talking about. The thinking I've had so far is that you then have a few options. You could go to one of the specific functions and say I want to see everythi
381.
by ibdknox 14y ago
Sure, anything can be built given enough time :) The difference is that those modes can be built in a couple of hours with arbitrary UI and virtually any interactions you can think of. It's hard for me to imagine being able to build any of
382.
by ibdknox 14y ago
As promised, this is the second demo complete with python! For those who can't use vimeo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=osLReQSB9F0
383.
by ibdknox 14y ago
Look for it at the beginning of next week :)
384.
by ibdknox 14y ago
Actually it's with another friend from high school :) He's dealing with trying to move out here right now, but you'll be seeing him a lot more - ibdthor is his username.
385.
by ibdknox 14y ago
We have some ideas on how we'll facilitate that. There will definitely be ways for people to sell plugins they create and or for large companies to keep them closed source.
386.
by ibdknox 14y ago
We're sticking with our goal on Kickstarter - if we hit 300k we'll definitely do it. There's a decent chance we will either way though.
387.
by ibdknox 14y ago
We had actually applied previously with a totally different idea, but then Light Table blew up and we resubmitted late.
388.
by ibdknox 14y ago
If they do, they'll be getting better, not worse.
389.
by ibdknox 14y ago
Nope! The plan is still for the platform to be open source, likely under a GPLish license.
390.
by ibdknox 14y ago
We normally would wait to announce this until it was time to drum up the press machine, but it was more important to us that you guys know what's going on. If anyone has specific questions/concerns, I'll be lurking.

More ›