iamnotsure

12 ms·

121.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
A fine line between puritanism, sobriety and cultural deprivation.
122.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
Pics or it didn't happen.
123.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
Status is like a state in programming. If you have no status, you're not autonomous. Too much status is not elegant. Therapy is like a sport, not necessarily healthy.
124.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_logic#The_resource_inte...
125.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
My first serious contact with scientific publishing was when I worked on master's thesis in bioinformatics on some very specific problem. I discovered that papers had systemic errors in input data, often statistics was not applied corr
126.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
How about recovering forgotten words.
127.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
Ban real time bidding.
128.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
Not to have the last word.
129.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
It's not about a smartphone, you're welcome.
130.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
You've described child abuse.
131.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
Smartphones are one of the greatest inventions of humanity. That they democratize access to information about the unfortunate state of the world is a different matter.
132.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
Humans have no reward circuits.
133.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
It's not a bug, it's a feature.
134.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
https://web.archive.org/web/20140825140626/http://library.mi...
135.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
My point was that LISP (1958) appeared earlier than Python (1991). What would be a deep property of a programming language?
136.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
https://github.com/stereobooster/programming-languages-genea... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homoiconicity
137.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
I am not sure if exclusively compile time `eval` is possible, by `eval` I mean `eval` that should handle I/O just fine. Such `eval` would make for compilation that possibly never ends.
138.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
I think `eval` along with `lambda` is slightly mind bending distinguishing feature of LISP/Scheme, but for sure, dedicated, optimized eval-less LISP/Scheme are possible and exist, if we consider s-expressions the distinguishing fe
139.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
I was thinking about the difference between templates in C++ or Haskell, which are kind of strictly compile time macro/code generation systems; vs macros in Scheme / Lisp, languages with self-contained compilers/interpreters,
140.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
Isn't it about runtime macros vs compile time macros aka templates, Haskell has no runtime macros, LISP has them, I'd guess you can manipulate and redefine mostly everything in runtime in LISP, not so in Haskell?
141.
by iamnotsure 4y ago
I'd say Monads are useful for encoding computation that ensures through type system that no data escapes wrapping; which can be used for tracking computations with side effects but not only. I am not sure about the Clojure macros vs Ha