iamalizard

6 ms·

61.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
> because I'm British, "one" and "won" are said the same for us Are they pronounced like wan or like won? > >In the examples we have "thyme → time", but doesn't "thyme" have the &qu
62.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
I'm not sure about the homophones. A spoiler for the some-owner puzzle: "one" is a homophone of "won", apparently, but I can't see how they're pronounced the same. In the examples we have "thyme → tim
63.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
Is that bad? It's economics. The artist likely decided they'll make more money that way. Hardcore or richer fans will be able to travel to Wembley or Amsterdam. Less enthusiastic and poorer fans won't. I can't attend mos
64.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
It's just a trend I've noticed due to more piracy, ad-supported content, AI-generated art, free content and/or publishers taking bigger cuts. Obviously people still pay artists and will continue to do so but I don't see
65.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
The connection has timed out The operation timed out when attempting to contact www.thek6project.co.uk.
66.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
I understand what you're saying but it still mostly an issue for the artist - building a fan base. Otherwise if you have X amount of tickets to be distributed, you'll get X people at the venue, at most. Since the same number of pe
67.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
I get what you're saying and am not trying to argue with it, just presenting more of my viewpoint below. I was the kid whose parents never lied to about Santa. It felt so weird trying to explain he's imaginary to other kids at the
68.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
If I liked reading fiction, I wouldn't care if it was AI generated or AI-assisted, as long as there were good reviews or an indication that it's good to read. Otherwise I'd probably never find it as I wouldn't sift throu
69.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
Please provide evidence for such strong claims. Otherwise it's just FUD.
70.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
I never understood the issue with scalping and reselling tickets for a higher price. At all. And I've read a bunch of opinions here and on other forums and articles. None make any sense to me. It's a good that's being resold
71.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
> It's definitely a copyright nightmare - so no clue how this could work. It could work as a decentralized free and open source system that doesn't care about copyright. Like how torrents work now, but it would be good to have
72.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
But later you'll save mental tokens when reading "BNPL" instead of "Buy now, pay later".
73.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
If qualia is just an emergent property, it should follow that ethics exists just as a means to achieve a practical end like order or societal stability. What would be the answer to "in an isolated universe, would torturing a being capa
74.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
The easiest, and the fairest way in my opinion, is to realize parents can and should be responsible for what their children read. Just like you wouldn't give your kid access to your BDSM porn magazines from the 80s, you shouldn't
75.
by iamalizard 5mo ago
> In the country where I live even if you want to make just a tiny website for family and friends you essentially have to set yourself up for doxxing. You are required to put your real name on, as well as city and in case of something li