Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
iab
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
31.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
I appreciate your candor (and your article)
32.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Are you actually euler_angles, or are you really tait_bryan_angles
33.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
"...it goes against OpenAI use policy. (Brown)"
34.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
I wrote a detailed proof years before Mikolov on Twitter, but the 280 characters were too small to contain it
35.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Very subjective, but having a weight-tracker for weights is very motivating. Kinda gamifies it as well.
36.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Are you the kind of person who loves to track/measure things?
37.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Noted deep learning expert bill gates
38.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Letter Q really having a glow-up this month
39.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Does the set of all flagged posts include a post that lists all flagged posts
40.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
> more and more tech professionals are looking east. Way, way east. Over-an-ocean > east. To Europe. > The most well-known is Instagram chief Adam Mosseri, who attempted a London relocation late last year. While he may not have la
41.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Not the first time I’ve heard this combination of prediction + person
42.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Look forward to seeing it
43.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
He meant making in the medium hundreds of thousands : 1/N millions, where N is low. I have never heard anyone describe income this perversely
44.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
I can't help but think that is almost the default at large airports. A350, A330, 787, 767, 747, etc. etc. Special liveries - absolutely. Widebody - not really.
45.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
I love the plane, but what makes a 777 a "fun" aircraft?
46.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Also always amazed at the robustness of the systems built by AI in the physical space in these hypotheticals.
47.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Notice how I said "one", not "you"? Also at the end of the post, when I said: > I agree with you where that is "you", and not "one"? I find it fascinating that you are doing exactly what you accuse
48.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
It was crystal clear to you. Now imagine someone with diametrically opposed views - they also have an interpretation that is crystal clear.
49.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Instead of a honey-trap, it’s a money-trap
50.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
“I authorize burn now, good luck everybody else!”
51.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Happy to see this reach it's natural conclusion, in terms of subscribing to moral relativism. I think if this is one's worldview, it's hard to not use a "whataboutism" style of argument whenever questions of morals
52.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
It’s morally acceptable, and correct, to criticize both. Does this make sense? Feels strange asking this, because it is so obviously apparent, but I feel the need to given your response.
53.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Classic whataboutism.
54.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
What is god factorial
55.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Is the CEO-to-worker ratio of 398.8 not a moral issue? Hard to take the morality argument seriously here.
56.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
> without being able to replicate the results Not really failure to replicate if the conditions are different.
57.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
I think it’s too expensive to build a dam there
58.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
STOP THE COUNT
59.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
But what’s the downside
60.
▲
by
iab
3y ago
Triangulation -> trilateration
More ›