i_love_music

10 ms·

1. 31.▲
   by i_love_music 6y ago

   Fascinating. Can you follow up with more info on how the day progresses? You play one dealer against another or use some other technique?
2. 32.▲
   by i_love_music 6y ago

   Thanks. This is just a hard no immediately. Not only for the health of the child, but does ML have to be the solution for everything? I think a Rube Goldberg machine would be more reliable than this.
3. 33.▲
   by i_love_music 6y ago

   The whole story is bizarre, but that tidbit was just bonkers. How the hell did they convince a judge that it was ok to go wreck this poor woman's house/yard in hope is digging up some hidden precious metals that her son evidently
4. 34.▲
   by i_love_music 6y ago

   "I'd venture this was written by someone who has a more traditional machine learning background that wants new people to the industry to have that same foundation" Yeah I get the same feeling. I am hesitant to suggest it, but
5. 35.▲
   by i_love_music 6y ago

   Yeah that seems like a major flaw in this taxonomy. Like does the author really think there is significant enough difference between 'data' and 'big data' that it warrants an entirely separate track? That's silly.
6. 36.▲
   by i_love_music 6y ago

   This gave me a chuckle. Thanks for that
7. 37.▲
   by i_love_music 6y ago

   I think this is an important piece that is often overlooked when discussing search. I wonder if all the ads magically disappeared one day if people would view it as a positive or negative change in what they perceive as relevant?