hzhou321

37 ms·

1. 331.▲
   by hzhou321 12y ago

   "For function(s), we need worry about ..." ? Corrected.
2. 332.▲
   Vocabulary based programming(hz2.org)

   29 points by hzhou321 12y ago|27 comments
3. 333.▲
   by hzhou321 12y ago

   Thanks for detailed reply. I appreciate it. First let's get the emotion color out. Whether someone think "intuitive" or "like" is arbitrary -- depend on experience and will change. For example, I have been thinking
4. 334.▲
   by hzhou321 12y ago

   For middle aged person, how about "what new skills are you growing?" One of the dilemma in learning new skills is there are so many new skills out there and how do you know that spending effort in learning the new skills are more
5. 335.▲
   Adding a hash table in C(hz2.org)

   2 points by hzhou321 12y ago|0 comments
6. 336.▲
   by hzhou321 12y ago

   I wish every day is like this!
7. 337.▲
   by hzhou321 12y ago

   I wish Gilbert Strang would teach calculus and write a book as he did for linear algebra.
8. 338.▲
   by hzhou321 12y ago

   Oh I noticed my mistake, now corrected.
9. 339.▲
   Programming is Natural(hz2.org)

   1 points by hzhou321 12y ago|0 comments
10. 340.▲
    by hzhou321 12y ago

    I know. But I find it too difficult to use. Maybe it is just me. The big idea behind MyDef is if the programmer find something is more natural, he should at least try it. I (the author) do not really care if anyone use MyDef per my implemen
11. 341.▲
    by hzhou321 12y ago

    It is not a library. It is a syntax. An important idea of MyDef is the implementation behind the syntax is accessible to the programmer so the programmer can read, check, verify, modify and create. So when the programmer later decide to opt
12. 342.▲
    by hzhou321 12y ago

    Obviously it is my ignorance. I'll revise it back. But I still think MyDef is more than lisp. I need find a lisp expert friend (that is willing to understand MyDef) to make better narration. :)
13. 343.▲
    by hzhou321 12y ago

    I am not sure I find your syntax intuitive, but I understand that takes individual experience. The main point (I am the author btw) is to have a lexical layer above the programming language layer, and give the programer control on how to wr
14. 344.▲
    by hzhou321 12y ago

    When there is no free variable, there is no sum, just the loop. But you are right the the notion does not work as is because complicated subscript support is not implemented yet. But the equation is listed before the programming part is men
15. 345.▲
    What you see is what you think(huizhou.gitbooks.io)

    1 points by hzhou321 12y ago|0 comments