hype7

8 ms·

61.
by hype7 14y ago
Thank god someone else picked up on this. I'm willing to take the article at face value in its description of the results of the research; but the analysis is all nut job territory. The singles not caring about the future is one perfect exa
62.
by hype7 14y ago
You are promoting the economic equivalent of a Ponzi scheme that by its very definition is not sustainable.
63.
How Corruption Is Strangling U.S. Innovation(blogs.hbr.org)
12 points by hype7 14y ago|0 comments
64.
US calls Assange 'enemy of state'(smh.com.au)
1 points by hype7 14y ago|0 comments
65.
The dangers of marginal thinking(hbswk.hbs.edu)
1 points by hype7 14y ago|0 comments
66.
by hype7 14y ago
If that's true, given that Apple felt it was being copied by Microsoft in the mid-1990s, took them to court, and lost — I'm not sure how much more "anti-patent" you can get for Apple than losing a case on its core product — then why did the
67.
by hype7 14y ago
If that were true, then why is Apple copying Samsung? http://allthingsd.com/20120803/apples-eddy-cue-saw-market-fo... There's never going to be a true counterfactual to whether Samsung would have innovated more or less if Apple hadn't com
68.
by hype7 14y ago
Sorry, I don't see the article saying that a company innovates because it was copied. What it says is that being copied doesn't stop innovation — which is the whole premise of the IP system (if I can't recoup my R&D costs, then I can't
69.
Who cares if Samsung copied Apple?(blogs.hbr.org)
79 points by hype7 14y ago|67 comments
70.
How to get into your zone(blogs.hbr.org)
2 points by hype7 15y ago|0 comments
71.
by hype7 15y ago
I'm the author of the article, I'm working with Clay at the moment. Thanks for the comment. It's subtle, but I think that most people outside of companies assume that decisions get made as you're describing above — separate questions of "wi
72.
The Real SOPA Battle: Innovators vs. Goliath(blogs.hbr.org)
10 points by hype7 15y ago|0 comments
73.
by hype7 15y ago
Direct3d? Why not use OpenGL? Plug-n-play? That's a standard? Adding TCP/IP - thanks, Microsoft, for not embracing and extending that one. Internet explorer? Gee, thanks Microsoft for abusing your monopolistic powers to knock out Netscape a
74.
by hype7 15y ago
Are you kidding me? He made computers affordable? Is that what you call a convicted monopolist, using anti-competitive tactics to drown out competition? Making things affordable? He exploited market power and made, by and large, shitty prod
75.
by hype7 15y ago
I don't know. Not to come off as mean spirited, but when someone puts themselves in the public spotlight, sends out requests to speak, then sends a list of demands in addition to... I'm all in favor of principled people. But if nothing else
76.
"I'm going to destroy Android, because it's a stolen product."(google.com)
4 points by hype7 15y ago|1 comments
77.
by hype7 15y ago
http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/eyestrain/DS01084/DSECTION=...
78.
Apple's Siri Is as Revolutionary as the Mac(blogs.hbr.org)
7 points by hype7 15y ago|2 comments
79.
Did Google train its own enemies with Android?(blogs.hbr.org)
3 points by hype7 15y ago|1 comments
80.
by hype7 15y ago
I saw BigChampagne ( http://bcdash.bigchampagne.com/who ) tweet about the article, and they say that even among the younger people they work with/survey say that ownership is more important than access. I don't think it's changing.
81.
by hype7 15y ago
Wow, you haven't experienced any of those issues therefore they can't bait and switch?
82.
by hype7 15y ago
ditto. something to think about before investing all your music in it