hwers

29 ms·

331.
by hwers 5y ago
I feel like this is going to blow up into a thread with a ton of comments about peoples own personal opinions on hiring - while the actual content of this tweet thread barely flesh much out about the topic.
332.
by hwers 5y ago
Just curious if anyone reading this knows the answer: Would it be illegal to contribute man-hours on e.g. implementing features or fixing bugs on a project like this, or does that only apply to whoever actually hosts the content?
333.
by hwers 5y ago
Just a comment: This usually isn't how GAN progress is made. I haven't really seen any GAN that incorporates advances in 'fake detection' directly into its discriminator. Usually it's just GANs getting more data and
334.
by hwers 5y ago
I'll be honest and admit that in taking a second look I noticed that they totally admit to this being a republished article from earlier: " [...] BBC Future has brought you in-depth and rigorous stories to help you navigate the cu
335.
by hwers 5y ago
I wonder why the article has the title '20170629-the-hidden-signs-that-can...' in the url. That date would suggest it's from the 29th of june 2017 (while the date below the headlines says 2020), way before the current breakth
336.
by hwers 5y ago
I guess that means they better start working on non differentiable ways of detecting deep fakes.
337.
by hwers 5y ago
Models come in a broad spectrum and while it's true that gpt-3 costs a ton, many do not. Any mobile ready snapchat esque real time deep fake filter will typically be super fast and cheap to train (since the model has to be lightweight
338.
by hwers 5y ago
This is all interesting but a huge part of me suspects that this is an arms war that will be impossible to win in the long run.
339.
by hwers 5y ago
Please no memes on HN
340.
by hwers 5y ago
This is the kinds of people I want to track the project output of in the decades to come.
341.
by hwers 5y ago
Why do I feel like all comments in here are in coalition with the creator of this site.