hvdijk

8 ms·

31.
by hvdijk 4y ago
That's not wrong. It's something that not everybody will like, but as long as the extensions don't conflict with anything specified by POSIX, that is permitted. To me, the decision to let POSIX mode turn off extensions that a
32.
by hvdijk 4y ago
Even for those that do not assume GNU make, this may not be enough. GNU Autotools are not limited to running on GNU make, but this make does not implement everything used by Autotools. The first thing I noticed it does not handle is VPATH (
33.
by hvdijk 4y ago
C++ didn't discard that idea entirely, you can have a struct tag and a function with the same name and you need to be able to do that in order to use stat().
34.
by hvdijk 4y ago
Remember that this started with "This one wouldn’t have been censored if it was spelt correctly :)" There is nothing about the US in there, only about correct vs incorrect spelling.
35.
by hvdijk 4y ago
Do you have any support for your position that that is a poor spelling? There are multiple ways in active use of transliterating Japanese. One of them involves writing shi+i as shii to produce shiitake, which is then left as is. Another one
36.
by hvdijk 4y ago
I wonder what your professor's opinion on OED is. It includes shitake. https://www.lexico.com/definition/shiitake (note the "also shitake")
37.
by hvdijk 4y ago
No, it wasn't. Merriam Webster includes shitake as a less common but valid spelling. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/shitake
38.
by hvdijk 4y ago
> We can clearly see that YOLOv6s detects more objects in the image and has higher confidence about their label. If actually look at the images they provide directly above: In the first image, the older one detects one extra tie. In the
39.
by hvdijk 4y ago
You're saying the project's maintainer is deliberately misrepresenting mrustc's goals in order to prevent malicious interference by the Rust community? Both of those seem very unlikely to me and I can't see anything in y
40.
by hvdijk 4y ago
> And I'd absolutely categorize "use \b instead of \< or \>" as a pretty small difference. I don't know, to me \b always felt like a bad idea. Start of string (^) and end of string ($) make sense as different sy
41.
by hvdijk 4y ago
BRE vs ERE is really a non-issue for me: the way they're done in GNU's regular expression implementation, BRE and ERE are the same except for small differences in when you do and don't put \ in front of certain characters. GN
42.
by hvdijk 4y ago
> Right, so you want a POSIX compatiblr tool because POSIX is what you're used to and you don't want to use any other interface. Well, I would want to use a single RE syntax if possible. It does not have to be POSIX BRE with GN
43.
by hvdijk 4y ago
It's nothing missing, it's just different for no clear reason, and that means remembering different syntaxes depending on which tool I am using at the moment. The one I use most: GNU grep and git grep use `\<` and `\>` for w
44.
by hvdijk 4y ago
> Conform to tools that share a similar niche. If you’re using Rust to make a fast alternative to popular coreutils: model its behavior, help-text, and man pages after `ripgrep` and `fd`. I'm surprised by this. Why wouldn't you
45.
by hvdijk 4y ago
> Maybe it was, I don't know. What law in PA requires a proportionate response? Nobody said it was illegal, but a disproportionate response is not likely to go over well with other people here. Whether that is a problem depends on w
46.
by hvdijk 4y ago
> They probably already know more than that, because they've seen some emails being exchanged. Someone being in your contacts list does not mean you have ever had any contact with them.
47.
by hvdijk 4y ago
You don't, you can trigger the installation directly from mainstream Android browsers. When the download finishes, there's typically a notification that it finished, and that notification allows you to open the downloaded file dir
48.
by hvdijk 4y ago
> Mutual, consenting sexting between two teenagers can't possibly be illegal, can it? If those teenagers are minors and are sending sexual pictures of themselves, they are sending sexual pictures of minors. Without an exception in t
49.
by hvdijk 4y ago
The puzzle doesn't state whether Sandy has figured it out because that information is not necessary to figure out the solution. We can infer that she has (under that implicit assumption that she is a perfect logician) by the fact that
50.
by hvdijk 4y ago
We are given that he says he does know and have no reason to doubt it. It is possible that Peter and Sandy know one another and already know that they are perfect at figuring out maths/logic puzzles.
51.
by hvdijk 4y ago
"Trillion" has two meanings. I'm Dutch, we use the traditional meaning of 10^18, what you call quintillion :)
52.
by hvdijk 4y ago
It is both: it is a sequence of turns that if you repeat them over and over, will take you through every possible cube state. But it is possible that the shortest such sequence is trillions of moves long.
53.
by hvdijk 4y ago
It has to exist: it's a mindbogglingly large but finite number of possible permutations, and to go from any one permutation to any other takes a finite number of moves. Therefore, if you can enumerate all possible permutations in some
54.
by hvdijk 4y ago
They may be enforceable even in Europe. The situation in the Netherlands is explained at < https://blog.iusmentis.com/2008/04/05/de-rechtsgeldigheid-va... >; in short, for general terms and conditions tha
55.
by hvdijk 4y ago
The objection that the GP raised, the lack of a check that the result includes all of the elements of the input, is not needed under your notion of a system that works according to its specification, as according to that specification it is
56.
by hvdijk 4y ago
Do you know of any sort routine that guarantees the result includes all of the input elements even in the event of random bit flips? If not, do you consider the sorting routines in your everyday libraries improper as well or is that a speci
57.
by hvdijk 4y ago
That is probably a bad example. That is a GNU extension, so if handling this via the preprocessor, the right guard should just be #ifdef __GLIBC__, I think. That should cover both glibc and glibc-compatible libcs such as uClibc. (Yes, uClib
58.
by hvdijk 4y ago
Do you have examples of this? What __linux__ && !__glibc__ should mean, in my opinion, Linux but without glibc extensions. This does not imply musl, but does happen to also be what musl aims for, so there is going to be users where
59.
by hvdijk 4y ago
That may be good. If the pointer arithmetic with integers, or other constructs that have the effect of disabling optimisations, is kept to the code that has additional requirements beyond what the standard guarantees, that means the code ou
60.
by hvdijk 4y ago
That is integer arithmetic, not pointer arithmetic. My understanding of the C memory model that is mentioned in the article (look for PNVI-ae-udi) is that what you are doing is or will be well-defined. I suspect there may still be a few imp

More ›