hutzlibu

41 ms·

571.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
How do you get that your machine(or one of the many you are observing) was breached, if the attacker is not doing obvious damage? I think monitoring connections is standard procedure to find this out?
572.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Yeah, but in the long run (or very soon), you might have to use grammar misstakes as a captcha, to seperate bots from humans.
573.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
But a very interesting ceramic, with the patents guarding the manufacture expired it seems.
574.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
I am guessing yes. It just would be really, really slow and expensive to build, so you might as well switch to something more cheap, like diamonds.. Edit: but it is not clear to me, whether this technic can be applied to macroscopical objec
575.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Ok, I also have no hard data at hand, but in my impression the vast majority of projects even started by individuals today do not use the GPL, but rather MIT or alike. Me too, because I do not like the concept of copyleft. I like the intent
576.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"If you mean by setting `position: absolute` and then using left/top/right/bottom to position your element, that won't work." Erm, but it does? You can listen to resize events and you can get the exact width an
577.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"Yes, you need to be careful when you integrate GPL and LGPL code into your proprietary code base, and in some cases you just cannot do it. But so what? You are not entitled to use of that code. If you can't use it because of its
578.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"To survive the flood of revenue optimized content (recipes being a familiar example), you need an active [software] agent working on your behalf to read content and make one straight thing out of the crooked timber of the web." S
579.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"but you can't write your own layout algorithm." Of course you can - in javascript. What is stopping you? (except that you don't like it) You can also ditch the DOM alltogether and only use the canvas/webgl and mayb
580.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Possible. The native americans had (have?) the word ghost to describe the europeans who conquered their land.
581.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
I don't know if you are wrong or right. But to be sure, I just stay away from copyleft as it seems safer ... see the point? Most people want to write software, not worry about licences. MIT seems easier, so people use it. For commercia
582.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
They just realized they didn't really needed their own rendering engine. It would have been a nice to have, like in the old days of IE6, where they could decide over the direction of the web. But more valuable to them is that people a
583.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"A lot of the functionality is all that PWA stuff no one asked for and no one is using for anything good anyway" It is really hard to engage with your comment in a constructive way, if you start by insulting everthing on the web,
584.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"Goes without saying, its a browser, browsers are never finished. " But they can be working enough, to be useful. Meaning they can display correctly the pages you want to see. So the best independent effort of a working browser I
585.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Do you hate specificly the comic, or that people often post it, where it is not contributing to the discussion?
586.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"but your statement is more humble than the last." It also was a different person ..
587.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Ideally yes, this is what I would like to do, to be able to control armies of bots. So because of the limitations, there are only 2-3 smart bots and lots of dumb ones.
588.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Me too and it always felt wrong to me and never did it myself. Now I have a solid reason. Oh and you should not drink directly from the warm tab water, as warm water that was standing some time, has way more microorganisms .. a point my 2 y
589.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Yes exactly. But the projectiles are moving every tick, so the evading logic wants to run every tick as well. But optimizing that will be up to the player..
590.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"Can you cast a smaller set of rays first, and only cast the in-between rays if certain conditions are met " Yes I can do this. But my case is really special as in basically the players have to do this by themself. As it is (also)
591.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"It sounds like you are trying to query every angle in every direction for every character. This is madness." It is just a different game than yours, so maybe don't judge?
592.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Yes. I just expect raycasting to work allmost as good as possible, not on 50% to become a unnecessary blocker. But they say, they are going to fix it with some priority.
593.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"but there are almost certainly ways to optimize this problem." Sure, I optimize what I can. But there is only so much I can do, without hurting the core game mechanic. Which is a arcade shooter, but also a hacker game, where you
594.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
But this approach actually also works and delivers different results in 2D space, than doing what you probably have in mind. This approach in 3D would basically mean live raycasting rendering, which is something I would like to try in the f
595.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
20 years old and the break strings(?) just snapped. I suppose the mechanic did a sloppy job before (never went there again). It was flat where it happened, but we have mamy quite steep roads here as well. So could have ended badly. (So it w
596.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Well, the world is destructible, so when there is a small hole (of dynamic size) in a wall, then a enemy bot should really only see the player, if there is no rubble blocking the path. Meaning tiles are waay too big for my simulation and ra
597.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
It used to be waaaay more expensive and has gotten much better now. But it still costs, all I know is, that when I do 600 raycasts each, it costs me around 8 ms on medium hardware. Batching it reduces the cost to 2 ms for me. For simple thi
598.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Well, I would like to be able to do 1000s of raycast per frame (360 for each bot), but cannot and yes, I do not use godot, but my own engine (with pixijs for graphics and a emscriptem port of box2d for physics https://github.com
599.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
"If you're spamming 1000s of raycasts per frame for your 2d game, there's probably something else going on..." Yup .. but maybe not stupidity, but rather a non generic game. In my case I need lots of raycasts, to determi
600.
by hutzlibu 3y ago
Yeah, but the point of terror is to make terror, that people are afraid. Not to actually damage much. A dirty bomb would be a perfect terror weapon as people are afraid of radiation and mostly would not trust government when they declare it

More ›