hurril

7 ms·

31.
by hurril 10mo ago
You have a good point there, that is better. But it is still, well honestly, wrong. Two orders ordered at different times are just not the same order, and using a typeclass approach to say that they most definitely are is going to bite you
32.
by hurril 1y ago
An architecture that consists of monads.
33.
by hurril 1y ago
See, I don't think you don't really understand my point. I said this elsewhere: I have been programming Scala and Haskell for more than 15 years, which I am sure you have as well. This is not ment as a proof of my point as that wo
34.
by hurril 1y ago
I am going to interpret your question as one asked in good spirit. I like this book: https://www.manning.com/books/functional-design-and-architec...
35.
by hurril 1y ago
I think that a big problem here is the fact that in OOP, everything is an object, i.e.: a class. And if all you have is a hammer, then .... But it is much better to picture the model, controller and the view as emergent. But implementing th
36.
by hurril 1y ago
You both have good points. But there is monads the mathematical and programmatic concept, and there is also something a little bit handwavy in how these things are incorporated into an application architecture. The latter is what is being u
37.
by hurril 2y ago
It runs on .NET, for god's sake. This is not a small platform.
38.
by hurril 2y ago
F# is a wonderful language, one that I write as my daily for the second time during my carrier. It _baffles_ me how it isn't more popular than it is because it truly is very very good. And I say this as an experienced and avid function
39.
by hurril 2y ago
My own functional programming language. I'd done an imperative before but wanted one that has pattern matching, would let me do currying _and_ uses a bidirectional type-checker. All of this is currently implemented but not for all type
40.
by hurril 2y ago
You are derailing my question above with a whataboutism here and I am being downvoted for pointing that out. There are problems with a lot of things in the world, for instance the rentier economy you mention here. But I don't owe anyon
41.
by hurril 2y ago
Here, let me help you: things should not have problems. There. Solved it :)
42.
by hurril 2y ago
Which privatisations are the cause of this energy conundrum?
43.
by hurril 2y ago
The problem is that transferring energy like that requires both lines and the ability to receive the energy. Transferring has (large) energy losses, the ability to receive requires a large inertial mass, like the large and heavy turbines of
44.
by hurril 2y ago
Oh, misunderstood. You still need to think about what it is you wish to optimise for. I am not a regulation hater but naive regulations tend to cause rather than mitigate pathological economic incentives. It is very very hard to get these k
45.
by hurril 2y ago
What is gained by preventing the company from accepting more money than your revenue cap? It would be bad for everyone. What are you trying to optimise?
46.
by hurril 2y ago
Much bigger per capita?
47.
by hurril 2y ago
This is not a good explanation without also looking at who is unemployed. In Sweden, the unemployment is low:ish but it is basically non-existent with the natives, but very high among immigrants. So it might be true that crime correlates wi
48.
by hurril 2y ago
What does it mean for a thing to be hard to do in the context of different programming languages? Hard and easy here are extremely deep and complex subject matters. Is goto hard or easy, for example? The person is going to give up (or you a
49.
by hurril 2y ago
This hinges on a thorough understanding of safety. It also does not even mention trading things off. Both of which are topics that will require further clarifications. And as it were: and so on.
50.
by hurril 2y ago
Guided to want it. Sure. Everyone else, all those other folks with other lives, opinions and preferences, they are brain washed by my enemies. Come on, man :) I just wanted Passwords to be its own app because the Settings applet(?) is obnox
51.
by hurril 2y ago
I love Apple products but I doubt this will become good.
52.
by hurril 2y ago
Why are you even doing anything with the scrolling? Something someone can do in JavaScript in a WebPage is better than the implementation in my touch pad on my Mac?
53.
by hurril 2y ago
Happily interested in this, I discover that they have broken the scrolling on the homepage about this for reasons. This tells me that since they have never tried their own homepage, they don't really care about usability so their produ
54.
by hurril 2y ago
Yes. Mobile friendly sites tend to suck because they take us back to WAP and the 90:ies. Even desktop sites suffer from a weird movement recently where all text is unbearably HUGE.
55.
by hurril 2y ago
Thing is: derivatives are verboten, sometimes. Otherwise we could all just steel and rename all the things.
56.
by hurril 2y ago
I was trying to explain so that you might understand, that there is a continuum between copying (the identity function) to more complex combinations of other transformations via your memory/ intuition. I am definitely not trying to con
57.
by hurril 2y ago
So this comes down to probabilities then. What is the probably that the fact that my TotallyNotLinux-kernel matches line-by-line with the actual Linux-kernel? I didn't copy it. Promise! But my function called println which is very very
58.
by hurril 2y ago
An exact match is of course a derivative, let's call it the identity derivative. So in: let new_code = f previous_work where f could be identity. But it could be other transformations such as: rename_all_the_things, move_items_around,
59.
by hurril 2y ago
That is my point right there.
60.
by hurril 2y ago
While I understand the concepts of derivatives and tainted code, this AI/human-dichotomy is not as good as that reasoning requires it to be. Every statement of code I commit is in fact a derivative of work that potentially had an incom

More ›