Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hunterb123
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
Well go ahead, provide the best car for comparison out of your list of "a lot of cars". Then we can objectively compare it to the closest Tesla model to it. That is if that car is even being manufactured at any scale at all...
32.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
I've been in the mastodon world for longer than the Twitter drama, so I'm well aware. When you block other instances you realize you are islanding yourself off, right? Not the other way around. Everyone is federated until you bloc
33.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
Yes there are multiple people here, but the general sentiment was negative among most threads. Go ahead and look over any Mastodon thread a year ago or before. Generally it was dismissed with "oh it's too niche" or "mode
34.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
Never underestimate HN's pettiness and spite! Now it's mainstream to work on a a cool technology that's been around for awhile! Oh and everyone can act like they weren't bad mouthing the tech and saying it wasn't
35.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
So you think sending in humans is the better option? - REPLYING TO BELOW - > Why does anyone or anything need to “go in”? There are plenty of other ways to deal with these situations instead of pretending to be Seal Team Six. Such as? Li
36.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
My point was you can't gleam any sort of knowledge about what internal employee information they have based on a careers page. It's all speculation based on nothing of substance. That's why I asked GP to expand on his thought
37.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
It's not about how much you produce, it's about how well you knew the reasoning behind the thought. By talking with the person directly you're able to understand that reasoning much better vs interpretation.
38.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
Are you basing your opinion off of this one web page or...? They wouldn't need a careers page to know who to hire, generally careers pages are for applicants.
39.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
It isn't fan fiction, generally fans don't talk directly with the creators of their process, for years on end. Socrates pupils listened and discussed his ideas with him directly and very in-depth. Instead of him writing down state
40.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
missing the most important part. the underbrush.
41.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
No when you have ADHD it's really really hard to get started on a new task, but you do obsess over a task once you get started on it. You'll do everything you can to avoid it first though, until the stress of the deadline overweig
42.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
You forgot to link the source
43.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
> based on his enthusiasm to invest in Elon's takeover of Twitter Could you explain what you meant by this?
44.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
$67 million (D) vs $2 million (R) is significant. It also depends who it was given to.
45.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
I've had some success with https://github.com/TypeScriptToLua/TypeScriptToLua Luau may be an alternative as well, haven't tried it. I love Lua, but at larger scales it's unmanageable. Nim is used heavily
46.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
"All of the people who have different life choices than me will die out one day" Is that all cultures you're waiting to die out that are using ICE vehicles and eating chicken, or just Western peoples? Lots of babies and and f
47.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
The entire piece is about guilt tripping the reader into eating algae under the threat of climate change. The title is called "Is it time to start eating algae?" even... The answer to the title is no, unless you want to, which you
48.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
that proves their point does it not? some transit costs $5m per mile, some transit is $1b per mile, find the corrupt one. anytime you have a large spigot of taxpayer money you'll have people in charge trying to funnel it away using con
49.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
anyone can eat algae if they want to, most don't want to. some people do want to eat crab and lobsters, some don't. it's not a naming issue or a perception issue, it's a choice issue.
50.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
You first, Sarah Gibbens
51.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
You can operate on very little knowledge of English. Essentially you can learn middle-out vs other languages. To understand a programming language you just need the bare bones. English is the JS of programming languages though, being that i
52.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
Dylibs is for including 3rd party code at build time, maybe a client to consume an API. ExtensionKit allows you to expose realtime UI or information, coming from an installed app instead of a 3rd party service. That way you don't have
53.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
This allows you to expose either a view or a function in your app to be shown/executed in another app.
54.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
Noone saw this and said, "you know what I'm going to focus on the climate now". Everyone just sees a person wasting glue, vandalizing art, and acting like a child. It's a selfish act to make them feel better and boast am
55.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
So in your mind coal produces the same amount of emissions as fracking just about. Not even that but every country and it's industries that have been transitioning from coal to nat. gas are fudging the numbers to pretend it's bett
56.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
> but if we cherry pick one single metric, sure... First off, I'd say total emissions by electricity generation is a great single metric to look at. Second, those studies you didn't even reference were most likely FUD. I'v
57.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
1. Methane disappears very quickly 2. It's very small amounts and it can be captured (and is in some instances) 3. The US reduced emissions while growing energy output thanks to nat. gas displacing coal. We don't have to take your
58.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
Generally you only frack where shale oil is, Germany you'd most likely use normal deep drilling. Shale oil deposits are usually found in harsh landscapes where not many people live. Fracking fluid is just 90% water, 9.5% is sand, 0.5%
59.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
It's not at all, that's a terrible emotional analogy that's 100% ridiculous. But since you're insinuating fracking is as bad as nuking a city... you do realize that emissions went down in the US while electricity generat
60.
▲
by
hunterb123
4y ago
Well don't leave us in the dark... What actions have you noticed that contradicts his statements? So we can debate whether or not you came to the right conclusion in interpreting said actions. Or were you just making general hand wavin
More ›