Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hunter2_
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
16 ms
·
241.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
Personally I only use it for battery savings when camping or similar. It's not the kind of thing everyone cares about. I think we're long past the days where a flight full of phones frantically searching for towers during takeoff&
242.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
> can't just be reset and setup with a new account I know mobile networks keep lists of stolen devices, but they can't be used at all? Like all possible recovery modes demand authentication?
243.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
When you say theft, do you mean by someone with interest in the hardware or the data? Assuming hardware, I'm not sure I understand why a thief who intends to wipe it anyway would care about an auto restart versus normal screen lock. As
244.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
I can't find anything built into my Pixel, but it seems that Samsung and others offer it, or otherwise third party apps: https://www.reddit.com/r/androidapps/comments/1cscmu8/app_th...
245.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
Awesome! (Unrelated: Now I just need to figure out how to overcome all these "Admiral" nags that are chipping away at my love for filtering on half of the legitimate news sites... any advice?)
246.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
The first comment over there has a tool for checking, and this baways is still blocked by one popular service, but no longer blocked by mine according to the tool and my own experience. I guess the author proved new ownership to the maintai
247.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
> I don't see them complaining? Yeah the pronouns throughout the a/b/c/d thing are confusing the heck out of me. I originally thought it was all about you (claiming expertise), then I considered perhaps me (complainin
248.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
Would it be best practice for filter list maintainers to purge on expiration, though? Bad actors would be able to take advantage of that. Until there's a standard around this, maybe blacklisted domains should just remain unused.
249.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
Yeah but after carefully overriding, TFA is basically saying that it's sharing a story about how this very domain used to be nefarious and no longer is... So I think it's just stuck in deny lists despite new ownership?
250.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
Not only that, but my filtered DNS is resolving it to a page saying (if I proceed through the certificate mismatch) it "blocked access to baways.com because it’s in our database of phishing and malicious domains"
251.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
I assume this mirroring is due to symmetry being more typical than not among the training data, and if instead trained with contrived diversity (e.g., males only conversing with females) then the output of the base model would follow suit w
252.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
> Al is only covered if he's making fun of the original song My only nitpick is to remove the word "only" because there is at least one other possibility where he's "covered" in the sense of not legally need
253.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
If he is not including a SPAM logo or a Pentium logo on his products, then it's not trademark usage. These names are not themselves marks when spoken/written/etc. even if marks exist that contain these names. If he is print
254.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
> He's parodying the CIA. I'm not sure about that. The definition of parody hinges on imitating an author or work (sometimes a whole genre), rather than on satirizing/critiquing subject matter unrelated to the author/
255.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
Right, plenty of the artists parodied by Weird Al are individuals. Any permission sought (or denials respected) are purely for goodwill, not legally required. That said, Weird Al hasn't actually distributed unmodified trademarks of oth
256.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
I've never been a big fan of any such language, regardless of layoff context. Do enough people prefer it that it's actually a net win for business by way of improved morale or whatever? I wonder if it's been seriously studied
257.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
I guess nominal, because not having kept up with inflation would be the main source of it sucking badly. I think of it like this: You lose to inflation badly with uninvested cash. You get close to keeping up with inflation with near zero ri
258.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
I wonder what the longest duration has been, in the history of let's just say S&P500 or similar, between [a low so bad that people would say "sucks that I'm retiring now"] and [the point in time prior to that, where
259.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
Isn't that pretty much just d7 without the d7 EoL? Better to migrate a d7 site to it (assuming a rebuild with current Drupal is too much work or doesn't have necessary modules) than run d7 despite EoL, but I'm not sure it mak
260.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
It absolutely is, but [using it for production of new items and using it for a repair shop] might take more resources than [just having the former and supplying some replacements]. What I'm saying is that we can't just compare con
261.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
I agree most people wouldn't want that. We're talking about typing the scheme in this particular comment thread, however. Most people who type a scheme followed by a single-label name (e.g., " http://facebook "
262.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
Maybe foam creation is also immediate, and wins that race to some extent?
263.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
Right, considering that single-label names (indistinguishable from search queries) have been a thing since WINS/NetBIOS, DHCP suffixing, etc. -- expecting a dot (let alone a dot followed by a public suffix) is bogus.
264.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
For sure, I don't mean to say it's right. Just that they don't seem to be leveraging non-layman definitions of words. The plan's price will never change really doesn't imply the plan's existence will never c
265.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
I'll accept that there could be precedent to use non-layman definitions of certain words, but how do you apply that justification to this quote from TFA: > "T-Mobile will never change the price you pay for your T-Mobile One pl
266.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
It's using less material and less landfill, but I wonder if it really is more sustainable in the grand scheme of things, at the scale of clothing and similarly sized items. The additional round trip shipping and workshop operations (HV
267.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
Indeed, a reasonable person would find that its usefulness has tanked!
268.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
> Last.fm came out 20 years ago (proving you don't even need AI for amazing recommender systems) What makes that recommender system not AI? Wikipedia say it uses "collaborative filtering" which Gemini says is a form of AI.
269.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
> the new get-rich-quick scheme for "creators" I wonder if the person executing the scheme would still be referred to as a "creator" in this case: they're creating a creator, and it's not so useful to have t
270.
▲
by
hunter2_
2y ago
Oh, I interpreted your "its real cost" as everything that goes into the service (i.e. everything the airline does to hold up their end of the deal, which goes well beyond fuel) whereas in my version I'm defining y far more na
More ›