Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
hundreddaysoff
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
5y ago
Naive related question from a crypto n00b that a lazygoogle failed to answer: I just plotted some Chia. I left my laptop open to do this. Usually I would just put the laptop in power save mode all night. My understanding is that to actually
32.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
5y ago
Not complaining, just giving y'all some interesting and updated information about my profession's economic situation and wondering why at least the patient end of the deal isn't getting any better. I'm pretty happy with
33.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
6y ago
FWIW, garden-variety West Coast ER doc here. Right now, I'm an independent contractor who makes ~$200/h. In a few months when my small company gets acquired, I'll be a W-2 who for various reasons will make ~$160/h before
34.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
6y ago
All markets stop eventually. There's no natural law saying they need to go up forever. Maybe you think they should keep going up, for whatever reason, and you might be right. But that's different than the fact that they increased
35.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
6y ago
This is an interesting theory. It also seems somewhat testable, because if true and Metz's superiors are not tone-deaf they we'd expect they will fire him, no? I wonder if it was Metz who had the idea for the original more positiv
36.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
6y ago
I do agree with parent that this is an interesting political hypotheical though. There was so much media focus on Parler for a while and ultimately AWS was exonerated as the good guy in the mainstream narrative. If Parler had self-hosted, w
37.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
6y ago
Just curious... in your experience, are most "Silicon Valley darlings" also more apolitical and pragmatic than this CEO's statement seemed to indicate he is? Or do they run the gamut? Just curious as this was my overall sense
38.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
6y ago
A second collective realization I'd like to see is that the SEC is still using the same faulty Value-at-Risk model they were using before the 2008 crash to estimate clearing funds. They should probably not use this model to do this any
39.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
6y ago
Here's a great discussion of that: https://johntreed.com/blogs/john-t-reed-s-hyperinflation-def... Great info that stands independent of the author's politics and book-shilling.
40.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
6y ago
How will these borrowed dollars be paid back short of real non-BS US economic expansion, which as I understand it is not presently occurring? If they are not actually paid back but just kicked down the road, are they still effectively borro
41.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
6y ago
One thing that could cause this loss of faith to occur is if the Chinese are successful with making their new E-currency a medium of exchange for Americans. My understanding is that the modern monetary theorists have an argument as to why t
42.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
7y ago
This is one reason I changed careers from research to medicine. Now social interaction is built into my job, whether I want it or not, and I'm a much happier man for it. Sometimes all the grind does have a useful endpoint.
43.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
7y ago
I'm an ER doc. A couple of points: 1. If we consult a specialist, that usually means we have no idea what's going on. Sometimes, we do it for "customer service" if a patient really wants the consult and doesn't seem
44.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
7y ago
Ha. The sad reality in our system is that if you choose science as a career, you publish or you perish. P-hacking allows you to publish. Most biologists know they need to publish or perish, but very few know what P-hacking is, although many
45.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
7y ago
You're not wrong. But the point of the press release was not to convey understanding. It was likely a PR vehicle for the scientists and thus for the university. The ultimate goal is for all of them to make more money. Paul Graham'
46.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
7y ago
My remembrance is that Campisi and others were thinking about them since at least the early 2000s.
47.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
7y ago
It's irreversible because it's at a greater rate than DNA repair. At least, it is in mammalian non-germ cells. Also, there isn't just one kind of DNA damage or DNA repair. Different kinds of damage have different orders of
48.
▲
by
hundreddaysoff
7y ago
emergency doctor