humanarity

10 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by humanarity 12y ago

   Well done :) as for interview simulators, there's always this: http://ipaulgraham.herokuapp.com/
2. 62.▲
   by humanarity 12y ago

   And you'd have no argument from me there ! :) How would you consider each were you in this situation?
3. 63.▲
   by humanarity 12y ago

   Yes, you've correctly comprehended the literal explicit question, that's all there is to it, isn't it? Except it really isn't about the explicit literal question, it's about the unasked real question. What happens w
4. 64.▲
   by humanarity 12y ago

   Great point. I'm no law expert tho I've heard there's different types of companies ( Delaware c ? ), as a matter of curiosity I wonder if the indemnification changes depending on the type of company.
5. 65.▲
   by humanarity 12y ago

   Sure that's possible, however, four things: 1) There's not nearly enough information to determine that from the post, 2) the post actually says evidence was collected, which may suggest the person was caretaking justice, 3) in any
6. 66.▲
   Microsoft TV Commercials 1986 – 2013 [videos](mashable.com)

   1 points by humanarity 12y ago|0 comments
7. 67.▲
   by humanarity 12y ago

   This is an awesome example. What would be an example of teaching the socratic method itself using the socratic method? Bootstrapping teaching methods works as a test of their validity :)
8. 68.▲
   by humanarity 12y ago

   Thanks for sharing that my answer doesn't contribute a thing for you! I invite you to create your own answer which does, so we can learn from you :)
9. 69.▲
   by humanarity 12y ago

   No I don't think you're misreading. Maybe you're right and it is patronising and passive aggressive. I'm struggling with a response to this, and I meant every word. The rebuttal is very compact and I admire that. I'
10. 70.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    Yes. You don't know so choose on your values. It's a fallacy to judge choices by their results anyway. You sound like a prosecutor, capable of convincing people to testify! :)
11. 71.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    That's a very compact rebuttal! I hope I can one day express myself so efficiently. Impressive. There was a time when I didn't know how useful "being yourself" was. I don't believe I'm the only one. For instanc
12. 72.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    You sound like a good listener, do you really think the real question is about the risks or is it about personal guidance? Hard to say, right? My feeling is personal guidance, because it just seems so overwhelmingly obvious to me the questi
13. 73.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    Know who you are then you'll know what to do. The question isn't about career impact. That's just like when someone's words are different to their body language. The question is different to the words in it.
14. 74.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    It works to give the benefit of the doubt and make a helpful contribution. For instance: my helpful contribution to you is did you notice the person said they had evidence? Maybe they'd been safeguarding some evidence, perhaps at some
15. 75.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    Porpoise hi :) thanks for the chance to expand on this, I really appreciate that today :) I agree with your point, and it's a goodun: how can you action authenticity if you don't know what it is? and if so it only makes the proces
16. 76.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    I also thought so, and then I heard the real question
17. 77.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    and yet somehow it does, which seems to be why it works :)
18. 78.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    Or hers :)
19. 79.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    I'd say there's something even more important operating here for you than career, and that's who do you choose to be? This is really a question it works for you to answer yourself. Consult your own values, search your feeling
20. 80.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    Sounds like a workable attitude, best of luck to you! My bet's on you.
21. 81.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    Disclaimer: I applied S15 and they declined to invite me. How do you know what you were rejected for? It doesn't matter. Either you were rejected because the assessment was it will not work, or you were rejected for a content free reas
22. 82.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    I think only the application (not all the listed co-founders) gets the mail. :)
23. 83.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    Yes!
24. 84.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    This is awesome.
25. 85.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    The writer of this piece is a genius. Amazing hackery.
26. 86.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    Response to disruption: First try regulation, then try PR hostility, and finally, when the window for improving the old business model has closed due to losses, appeal to the government for a bail out. "It wasn't our fault, we cou
27. 87.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    My mail and response: Your Y Combinator Application Y Combinator to me 1 hour ago Thank you for applying to Y Combinator; however, your startup was not selected to interview for the upcoming Y Combinator batch. We carefully reviewed thousan
28. 88.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    Thanks for sharing this. Well done for making an application, and you attitude toward creating your business sounds like it works.
29. 89.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    :) Glad you like it. Yeah, "screaming electrons", "organics in the reactor" -- digital culture is awesome :)
30. 90.▲
    by humanarity 12y ago

    So cool :D