huijzer

17 ms·

331.
by huijzer 2y ago
I think the one under "Stream Realtime" should be similar to the demo. It's only Gemini 2.0 flash though and not the full one.
332.
by huijzer 2y ago
> This was already posted here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43221377 but I’m really surprised at the lack of attention this model is getting. I'm surprised by the lack of attention that Gemini 2.0 with nati
333.
by huijzer 2y ago
Why are they hostile to the plans?
334.
by huijzer 2y ago
> And a corollary to this: There is probably an intellectual cost of returning to oral culture, which seems to be what's happening at the moment at a large scale [1]. If you talk about oral culture in the sense of having shorter mes
335.
by huijzer 2y ago
Depends a lot on the project, I think, as the parent comment suggests.
336.
by huijzer 2y ago
Similar with Shell indeed. From what I’ve heard, Shell electric car chargers are very unreliable. I think it’s a bit like Kodak. They know solar is going to eat (a part) of their lunch, but if they invest in solar then the oil revenue goes
337.
by huijzer 2y ago
Good tip thank you
338.
Show HN: trv. A tool to turn a presentation and speaker notes into a video(github.com)
3 points by huijzer 2y ago|2 comments
339.
by huijzer 2y ago
I don’t know but these are exactly the right questions to ask!
340.
by huijzer 2y ago
> It's really very specifically around Musk-stuff; his fans flag anything that makes him look bad. In my experience, anything political is flagged.
341.
by huijzer 2y ago
Don’t forget Google who typically make their best AI products available only to large customers. For “safety” of course.
342.
by huijzer 2y ago
> I've become so skeptic over the years that I assume almost all papers to be lies until proven otherwise. I couldn't agree more. I have read a lot of psychology papers during my PhD and I think there is very little signal in t
343.
by huijzer 2y ago
> This is truly in accordance with european values, where we reward participation and proclamation. Yes. In my experience the government is happy with "looks good doesn't work" as long as it truly looks good.
344.
by huijzer 2y ago
Probably waiting on the editor to find reviewers. So far the editor couldn’t find reviewers with experience in making an open LLM.
345.
by huijzer 2y ago
Not a surprising stance if the project is funded by the people who are responsible for said regulatory framework
346.
by huijzer 2y ago
For years I didn't know. Finally. Thanks!
347.
by huijzer 2y ago
In general from a formal logic perspective the whole idea of “an exception that proves the rule” is flawed. If the statement was “an exception that disproves the rule”, then I would agree.
348.
by huijzer 2y ago
I don’t think such a ban would be a good idea but I agree 100% with your sentiment that non-fossil based energy generation would probably be a better idea (especially for energy independence for example).
349.
by huijzer 2y ago
Predicting dropout in special forces selection. Yes I (semi) wasted some time to setup a repository including CI: https://thesis.huijzer.xyz/ . Link to source code and pdf are on that site. I hope it can satisfy your curiosi
350.
by huijzer 2y ago
The fact is that we are now years and years into hydrogen and we still have (almost) nothing to show for it. The number of electric cars and trucks vastly outnumbers the number of hydrogen cars and trucks. So the hydrogen people moved on to
351.
by huijzer 2y ago
As long as I don't have to submit a paper, I always use Typst nowadays for PDF generation. So for me that answer is a yes. (I also wrote my PhD thesis in typst and the thesis was accepted.)
352.
by huijzer 2y ago
> That sounds great, but those batteries are both too expensive right now and not available. In December, Chinese battery pack prices declined to 100 $/kWh according to BNEF, which was a new record low. Also battery production goes
353.
by huijzer 2y ago
How about we use solar panels to collect that energy? And then we add batteries to fix holes in supply when the panels can’t see the power source.
354.
by huijzer 2y ago
Fair enough. Very valid points. I guess it boils down to “test both systems and see what works best for the task at hand”. I can indeed imagine cases were your approach would be the better option for sure.
355.
by huijzer 2y ago
Stanford has received more than $1 trillion in funding [1], so even while they are not an government agency, I would not call them independent. I also don't think this is bad. As Heather Douglas argued in her book, science is never com
356.
by huijzer 2y ago
> but I'm always open to learning and listening. I appreciate that. The Twitter files are one example I was thinking off. A quote from Wikipedia [1]: > Stanford University's "Virality Project", in cooperation with
357.
by huijzer 2y ago
Last time I checked a few months ago, LLMs were more accurate than the OCR that the archive is using. The web archive version is/was not using context to figure out that for example “in the garden was a trge” should be “in the garden w
358.
by huijzer 2y ago
> The only protection against this is the strength of character of the owners and editors. I couldn’t agree more. Sometimes I wonder whether it actually is a loss that people are less Christian. Especially protestantism which places a hi
359.
by huijzer 2y ago
> Tesla obviously can't give people long sub 1% loans and make a profit in 2025. I think this is not the right way to look at it. Essentially, Tesla sells the car for a price that is higher than the sum of all the input costs (the m
360.
by huijzer 2y ago
Interesting comments from X: Snowball: "So FSD failed but you still managed to find a way to praise Tesla. You failed too for not taking over in time. But your concern isn't for the lives of third parties that You and FSD endanger

More ›