hu3

14 ms·

1. 271.▲
   by hu3 10mo ago

   Yep. It sucks. People are delusional. Let's ignore LLMs and carry on... On a more serious note: 1) Split tasks into smaller tasks just like a human would do Would you bash your keyboard for an hour, adding all video controls at once be
2. 272.▲
   by hu3 10mo ago

   isn't Claude Teams powerful? does it not have access to Opus? pardon my ignorance. I use GitHub Copilot which has access to llms like Gemini 3, Sonnet/Opus 4.5 ang GPT 5.2
3. 273.▲
   by hu3 10mo ago

   thanks. I'll take a look later
4. 274.▲
   by hu3 10mo ago

   I was talking in general if that escaped you. Hence "beliefs/preferences" and not only tools. And when it comes to programming languages, it's not as clear cut. As exemplified by the article. So the power tools is a poor
5. 275.▲
   by hu3 10mo ago

   Thanks for sharing your methodology. And ignore the rude people that it might attract please. I might start using a second LLM to review the diffs. Something like Gemini 3 Fast. Sounds good. But I don't want to give up on a fancy IDE t
6. 276.▲
   by hu3 10mo ago

   Bad analogy. If the alternative has drawbacks (they always do) or is not as well known by the team, it's perfecly fine to keep using the tool you know if it is working for you. People who incessantly try to evangelise their tool/b
7. 277.▲
   by hu3 10mo ago

   I understand "shouldn't really have any say on it" as shouldn't expect to infuence the project. Not that they are not allowed to say anything. Otherwise they would have written something along the lines of "shouldn&
8. 278.▲
   by hu3 10mo ago

   Yes. Since for blocking you can afford to have a less mature CSS engine. A tradeoff for performance.
9. 279.▲
   by hu3 10mo ago

   It's just an educational exercise to teach students to setup and mantain their own git server. Obviously students don't expect to use uni servers forever. They can setup their own with the lessons learned.
10. 280.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    > I know the solution. Starting this year, students will be forced to contribute to a project they use, care about or, at the very least, truly want to use in the long term. Not one they found randomly on Github. I expect that most of th
11. 281.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    Let's agree to disagree then. Initial praising doe not preclude rudeness. And complaining about a commit that was undone 30 minutes later is not only pointless in the presented context, it's a cheap attempt at insulting. > Are
12. 282.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    Yours an other similar comments are disproportionally rude given that the author was very upfront about their methodology. And I don't think it's constructive to cherrypick commits in this context. > I even started trying out
13. 283.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    Is it just me or this seems like a quick-win for many C++ codebases? Simple and elegant solution.
14. 284.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    It's about incentives. Go makes it explicit. And because it's standardised, it's easy to create tooling to flag mishandled errors.
15. 285.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    My problem is that Claude often don't consult the reference materials. And I am back to manually including markdown files in the prompt. Say I have a TypeScript.md file with formatting and programming guidelines for TypeScript. Sometim
16. 286.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    > Which they now regret for now. being early can be the same thing as being wrong.
17. 287.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    Neat. In PHP land, for some years now that code would not pass CI/CD checks and IDEs show red squiggles. Provided they use any popular static analysis tools like PHPStan, Psalm and I believe SonarQube would also flag it.
18. 288.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    phones these days are quite powerful That $25 phone has 8 cores and 4GB of RAM. https://www.gsmarena.com/motorola_moto_g_(2025)-13624.php
19. 289.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    do not share the link. they aren't engaging in good faith. haters are going to hate regardless.
20. 290.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    This is interesting. It's like the nix philosophy. When changes are needed, improve the spec and you can nuke the entire thing and start over. something like immutable code development. One major problem is: how do you not break existi
21. 291.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    no mention about trucks I guess a good part of the 4% are construction and other cargo trucks
22. 292.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    this doesn't work sometimes. my wife complains frequently
23. 293.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    Great writeup. Thanks for talking the time to organise and share. It's tempting to use this in projects that use PHP. Is it useable with a corpus of like 1.000 3kb markdown files? And 10.000 files? Can I also index PHP files so that se
24. 294.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    Documentation to guide devs on safe usage of C++ is enough? So any language should be allowed as long as they instruct developers to be careful.
25. 295.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    If [language] is so great, why does it need to be so ardently defended and its very obvious problems handwaved away? Every language popular enough is like that.
26. 296.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    which is easily fixable by some human guidance
27. 297.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    if your app can be replaced by a few vibe prompts I doubt it was successful in the first place
28. 298.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    Usually you only share API functions signature and response types. It's tempting to return a db table type but you don't have to.
29. 299.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    yep. if the project is large enough, there are usually changes to be made that don't overlap, allowing multiple agents to work concurrently without work trees. for example I can have a prompt writing playwright tests for happy paths wh
30. 300.▲
    by hu3 10mo ago

    Thank you for your work on open source.