hrimfaxi

9 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by hrimfaxi 7mo ago

   Can you explain your third statement? > As inhibitory synapses account for 20%-30%, this could map well to how biological brains are structured.
2. 152.▲
   by hrimfaxi 7mo ago

   I do think agency is the fulcrum and concede I was being too pedantic. I do think even from an agency perspective it is possible to "drop out" to some extent but not completely, but that's why I asked about the work aspect. E
3. 153.▲
   by hrimfaxi 7mo ago

   Okay if not American Slavery what's your benchmark? Having to do things you don't want? I'm being serious. You use extreme language and hyperbole so it's hard to take you seriously. Do you think your situation is akin to
4. 154.▲
   by hrimfaxi 7mo ago

   Astroturfing is a well-known occurrence on this forum and I don't have any shame for being vigilant about it.
5. 155.▲
   by hrimfaxi 7mo ago

   I didn't believe your nearly half statement but yep https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/10/us/politics/polls-wars-us...
6. 156.▲
   by hrimfaxi 7mo ago

   Do you work for roblox? You seem to have some affiliation to them https://github.com/Heliodex https://devforum.roblox.com/u/lewin4/
7. 157.▲
   by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

   Are you seriously equating the modern office and work, where, you know, you can go home after, to life as a slave on a plantation? Sure, analogies can have factors at different scales but the scales come into the equation when the factor is
8. 158.▲
   by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

   Can you expand on your included youtube link? It's not clear the relationship.
9. 159.▲
   by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

   I don't disagree. When the state runs out of enemies it manufactures more.
10. 160.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    My first thought was of people who may have been wearing them while entering passwords or viewing sensitive information.
11. 161.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    Is there no distinction between standing and moving violations?
12. 162.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    Which leads to the extreme—maximal crime leads to maximum police budgets!
13. 163.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    > (b) All persons within the jurisdiction of this state are free and equal, and no matter what their sex, race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sexual orient
14. 164.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    You can own a car and not drive it. It can be stolen from you, anything. The structure of this whole thing is to avoid having to do an actual investigation. They could subpoena the car owner's phone records for instance. Instead they c
15. 165.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    Can you explain why? I am surprised this kind of discrimination is allowed, too. I know some discrimination is allowed like for hooters, etc but that is more on the hiring side not on the customer options side.
16. 166.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    > In a 5–4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that opposition to homosexuality is part of BSA's "expressive message" and that allowing homosexuals as adult leaders would interfere with that message. How does this discrimina
17. 167.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    Are you in silicon valley by any chance?
18. 168.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    I see what you mean, and lack of a rejection email from the server is not proof of delivery either. I was looking to things like state process service laws. It doesn't seem like any type of receipt is required for electronic proof of s
19. 169.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    A read receipt is not proof of receipt but proof that you read it. They are not the same thing. If your office receives registered mail but your secretary threw it away without you reading it, you're still legally served right?
20. 170.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    Sure, but the parent was saying this part was odd: > "TNBU" is "UNBT" backwards TNBU is clearly NOT uNbt backwards.
21. 171.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    If registered mail is sufficient and that only requires proof of delivery/receipt, why would the same thing for email be insufficient?
22. 172.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    Okay and if you did that only for that message your intent would be really easy to prove.
23. 173.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    What do you mean models can't encourage anything? You've never heard of the term "words of encouragement"?
24. 174.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    It's about time. Reminds me of how even Apple uses Jamf.
25. 175.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    Like the RSF press freedom index, which ranks multiple countries in the top 10, where you can be jailed for expressing your earnest belief that something didn't happen? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_Hol
26. 176.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    > "Unfortunately," they wrote, "Counsel did not notice that AI had intuitively made changes to the brief prior to filing." What does intuitively made changes mean here?
27. 177.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    What does proof of safety look like in practice? Could you give some examples?
28. 178.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    Lawyers don't have unlimited removals though.
29. 179.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    This doesn't answer the question though. If someone says "how do I have safe sex" you don't suggest abstinence.
30. 180.▲
    by hrimfaxi 8mo ago

    Wow I had been trying to find an old session for quite some time, thanks for this.