houseofzeus

10 ms·

31.
by houseofzeus 5y ago
They were a publicly traded company and IBM offered something like $190 a share when they were trading around $120.
32.
by houseofzeus 5y ago
I'm not as familiar with Hyper-V but certainly for KVM you would probably interact with it (indirectly) using virsh which I find pretty capable. No sane human should be interacting directly with the qemu command line if they can help i
33.
by houseofzeus 6y ago
I really think it's mostly the issues with having advertized it for last gen consoles and then not actually delivered a playable experience on them. It sounds like there are indeed a lot of other bugs, but those seem like issues they w
34.
by houseofzeus 6y ago
The kind of people that are up in arms that CentOS 8 isn't going to be supported through to 2029 are using it because it has outdated packages.
35.
by houseofzeus 6y ago
Agree, I'd imagine most of them are also still on 7, which the lifecycle didn't change for and goes to 2024 even if they just stay where they are.
36.
by houseofzeus 6y ago
Depends where you go, it's not like there are no other tech companies in Austin for example.
37.
by houseofzeus 6y ago
I would see that kind of group thing as more about building some rapport in a less scary environment than a skip level so that they feel if something was up they can come to you.
38.
by houseofzeus 6y ago
I think what gets lost is that it's your 1:1, not the manager's. Same when you go to a skip level. If they are the one driving the agenda it is indeed probably going to be a waste of time. This cartoon is a useful prompter for d
39.
by houseofzeus 6y ago
Even in other countries where it's covered they often wont start screening for it until later in life when you are considered at higher risk (but you can get it much younger).
40.
by houseofzeus 7y ago
Does NYC have the concept of "paid duty"? Where a private company can pay for police to cover their event?
41.
by houseofzeus 7y ago
It's interesting that even on an article about a non-Linux Red Hat product, the answers to your question predominately focused on only the Linux part of the picture. From this I take it that most of the folks complaining about what is
42.
by houseofzeus 7y ago
There are bottlenecks in the Kubernetes architecture that start popping up once you cross about 250-300 Pods per node (the published limit in the K8S docs is actually 100). This is typically more of an issue when running the cluster directl
43.
by houseofzeus 7y ago
Exactly, the protesters have to win every day. China only has to win once.
44.
by houseofzeus 7y ago
Do you find you are getting a dense enough # of pods per host on bare-metal?
45.
by houseofzeus 7y ago
My interpretation is that they and Red Hat are just as "independent" as each other. That is they can do whatever they want as long as they keep making money...but if they don't then they can and will be course corrected by th
46.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
At that point it becomes about the nuance of defining what is really best for open source. Is it long term maintenance of ElasticSearch as it exists today, in which case I agree Elastic has the best incentive to keep it going, or is it net
47.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
While I might hope for more I don't expect a company to make decision any other way.
48.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
I didn't pose the original question, but in my mind "right" here is simply, made the best decision available to them at the point in time.
49.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
The VC funding is what appears to introduce it, but really it should be there from the start. By that I mean VC funding forces the founders to consider that simply having a viable project does not mean you have a viable product, but founder
50.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
Amazon do pay people to contribute to the kernel, and they have their own Linux distribution which when you poke it looks an awful lot like RHEL/CentOS but different due to some things Amazon add/change, so I'm not sure that&
51.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
Exactly, they can both be right. In Elastic's case though being right still doesn't mean they exist in 5 years. This doesn't reflect that what they did here was wrong but that by the time this started unfolding they were alre
52.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
It is not obvious that this action is actually in the best interest of open source. It's obvious that it's in the best interest of Elastic, but there is nothing intrinsically special about them that means they are the best steward
53.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
The challenge here is that there is an implied expectation that if you started or are the primary sponsor of the project, you should be the primary recipient of revenue resulting from same. Often this expectation is paired with a belief tha
54.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
Yeah, they dropped the ball on this one. Now they have a growing number of countries grounding it themselves which to me seems like a significantly worse look than if Boeing had proactively done it themselves (also keeps it in the news cycl
55.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
I agree. Even if it turns out to be a different cause, who wants to be the airline that gives it the benefit of the doubt in the meantime? The optics at this point if it happens again while this one is still being investigated are awful. Th
56.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
A lot of the OpenStack engineering processes, and tools supporting them, were actually really strong for an open source project from the ground up. The problem was that a lot of it was engineering for engineering's sake without a care
57.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
Docker are actually an example of a pattern, one that also impacts MongoDB and many other companies. That pattern is that they intentionally branded the product and the project with the same name (in this case Docker) to help with slipstrea
58.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
The big difference between Red Hat and a lot of these other companies is that if you look at a lot of their products, including the cash cow (RHEL), there is not a 1:1 mapping between the product and a single open source project. Rather the
59.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
I don't think it's accurate to say it's mostly Red Hat, they are a sponsor and sometimes contributor but most of the work still seems to come out of the Intel and Hyper.sh folks who co-founded the project out of Clear Contain
60.
by houseofzeus 8y ago
Not a direct comparison of these projects specifically but here is the write-up that was presented in the context of the Kubernetes SIG Node discussions about this topic: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QQ5u1RB

More ›