Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
horsawlarway
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
61.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
Agreed - I hit "Reset after 2 seconds", I hit "Add 1", and sure - it adds one, but it also unexpectedly cancels the reset. Which I don't expect from the description, and I also don't expect from the code. ---
62.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
I think this is the wrong take. If this was really the truth, the brand names wouldn't matter. But instead the brand ends up as the sole desirable target in the corporate sales. I think the more likely answer is that being an expert ju
63.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
If you can point me at any actual data that Saas companies are more like to be abandonware if AI is used... sure. But my experience with startups is that the odds are great they're ALL going to be abandonware in a couple years. Ex -
64.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
They specifically call out credentials used during the attack. But they should be rotating those regardless. You don't get to say "Maybe the attacker didn't get this credential". You just rotate. The most generous in
65.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
I find this thought process somewhat faulty given that the vast majority of software ends up in that spot regardless. Hard to take this as that big a deal when Google literally launched a product along similar social themes named "Goog
66.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
Or even similar ideological goals... (See: grok)
67.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
in what context, and at what ROI? Because... I have use-cases where this is true, and use-cases where this falls flat on its face. I don't actually think it's obvious (at all, really) without defining what "superior" mea
68.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
ping is going to dominate over 3ms in pretty much every situation. And the non-xwayland numbers are all within a single ms of each other. --- Not to undermine the measurements of the author (agree with you, it's a cool effort), but my
69.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
while I understand this argument - I think it consistently falls down when compared to the types of content that are generally purchased and consumed. I'd argue that most folks get plenty of value from the content itself, entirely sepa
70.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
Generally speaking - I agree with you. Source bias is a real logical fallacy, and failing to evaluate the content itself, regardless of the source, is a problematic view of the world. In the same way that I don't need the lumber in my
71.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
It somewhat boggles my mind that there are an incredible number of persistent, useless, and annoying comments on here every day accusing any and every article of being AI slop. AI is a machine that generates content that is supposed to be s
72.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
> but still it was obviously the right way to go compared to JS or, god forbid, shell. I just don't think this is true. Frankly - it's hard to argue this at all (even today) given that JS is the dominate language on the planet,
73.
▲
by
horsawlarway
3mo ago
Look at some of the typing present in MS COM back in the IE5/6 days and we can discuss more. I can honestly tell you - I'll take untyped languages any day of the week over that clusterfuck. Personally - I also think people really
74.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
I'm going to poke at a downstream consequence here. Lets say this catches on (in some form or another, whether in this precise implementation or not). So assume we have a world where resources can be gated by a payment wall that agents
75.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
These comments are worse than the slop.
76.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
Real question, have you actually used any of the llm based media generation tooling? Because "load samples, arrange them, and instruct it to do a thing" are basically the required steps. Arguably, if you don't care much about
77.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
Frankly, this is also how I mostly listen to music - I set a song or two I like, then I let auto-discovery keep adding to the list. If I happen to like it, I hit thumbs up/like. Otherwise I ignore it. I sometimes go through and browse
78.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
My increasing frustration with these plans is the harness lock in. Anthropic won't even let you run "claude -p [prompt]" any more... They bill it at api rates. So if you're trying to automate the ai (and seriously, that&
79.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
I really liked this in the day (and i just played with the version you linked and can still remember all the key patterns - I'm typing this comment with it now). But it just can't touch swiping for speed. Frankly, the keyboard I m
80.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
My experience has been that absolutely no one cares, as long as they could be construed to be "somewhat similar". Ex - People change hair color, lose a boat load of weight, wear eye-color changing contacts, drastically change hair
81.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
> In practice this means no rooted/jailbroken phones. Personally - this is less acceptable to me than just having the site collect my image/id. I'd support just putting the id in a dedicated device (ex - gov issues smart k
82.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
Yeah, totally reasonable comment given the utter security that must come from anthropic with their installer, amiright? oh wait... "curl -fsSL https://claude.ai/install.sh | bash" (right from https://cl
83.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
It's true we hit limits, but I feel like a lot of it was "limits" in the sense that the tradeoff stopped being worth the cost, so we optimized in other areas. So we hit limits on clock speed in the early 2000s (ex - the 4ghz
84.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
I'm also very impressed at the output given the lack of image support. They picked a task that heavily favors a model that can do multi-modal with images, and GLM still came within striking distance. What I'm hearing from this a
85.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
I just want to say, as someone who lost literally every single grandparent I had to covid... this dude can go fuck himself. Like - right up his own asshole. --- I understand this comment is inappropriate. I think the comment in the article
86.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
I don't generally switch to implementing myself on the model, although there are definitely times where I stop it and correct it mid-task. It's prone to thinking longer and more repetitively, again - it's definitely not opus
87.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
No real change in inference speed. It basically just allows me to slot in more context or a bigger model. A single RTX-3090 will do approximately the same tok/s, but it won't fit the entire 300k context in VRAM. Sometimes that ma
88.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
Yes, today is not a great time to purchase hardware. When I bought, I paid $850 a piece. And I needed one anyways for the gaming I was going to do. My guess is the next good time to buy is going to be 24-36 months from now, depending on ho
89.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
I mean - the base experience is just fine, with perfectly reasonable built in tools for file access and editing, plus bash. But yes - it expands a lot if you're willing to play with it. I'd actually say the vscode comparison is wr
90.
▲
by
horsawlarway
4mo ago
Pi is decent. I've used the cli agents for claude, cursor, and pi, plus several custom harnesses I've written myself from time to time as experiments (and I guess technically gastown, if we're calling that a harness). Pi is..
More ›