hoofish

7 ms·

1. 61.▲
   by hoofish 9y ago

   Sure, WikiTribune uses a soft wiki model in a way that insures reliable reporting. This requires a responsible paid staff while still keeping the collaboration of the outside community in tact.
2. 62.▲
   by hoofish 9y ago

   it is not blocked as a source, it is blocked site wide from sharing on talk pages of any editor.
3. 63.▲
   by hoofish 9y ago

   Where do you see any evidence of the author trying to alter Wikipedia to promote fringe science? You list RationalWiki as the "other side of the story", yet did you note that article was written by the same editors he encountered
4. 64.▲
   The Shining light of Wikipedia and other disappointments(wikipediawehaveaproblem.com)

   33 points by hoofish 9y ago|38 comments
5. 65.▲
   S is for Sock puppet(wikipediawehaveaproblem.com)

   2 points by hoofish 9y ago|0 comments
6. 66.▲
   Google Consciousness and Wiki Brain(wikipediawehaveaproblem.com)

   2 points by hoofish 9y ago|0 comments
7. 67.▲
   What is a wiki war?(wikipediawehaveaproblem.com)

   1 points by hoofish 9y ago|0 comments
8. 68.▲
   by hoofish 9y ago

   Editor suppression, misinformation, sock puppets, trolls, and impersonations - case studies into wiki wars.
9. 69.▲
   Wikipedia, We Have a Problem(wikipediawehaveaproblem.com)

   3 points by hoofish 9y ago|1 comments
10. 70.▲
    by hoofish 16y ago

    the problem I have with this is that some black hat people can do this to any site they feel they are competing with. what would prevent someone from blacklisting a legitimate blog or website just because they did not like the content?