homonculus1

10 ms·

31.
by homonculus1 4y ago
Would antiracism interrupt black people from making a racist remark?
32.
by homonculus1 4y ago
That's good, people should be able to do that. If people want to exchange cash for items of value there should be nothing stopping them. Police should just investigate crimes and stop laying totalitarian dragnets and checkpoints for ev
33.
by homonculus1 4y ago
You keep using more and more words to describe the same thing. Again, "antiracism" is oriented monotonically against whites. You won't contest that because if whites ever benefited from it then it would defeat your purpose. W
34.
by homonculus1 4y ago
Why would they mention it otherwise? Did they fire fewer whites to be "antiracist"? You can play coy but we all know this only goes in one direction, the entire revealed purpose of this ideology is to capture and redistribute re
35.
by homonculus1 4y ago
What I believe is that historic outcomes don't need to be "paid attention to" by firing extra white people. That is in fact a blatantly woke thing to do and you're not fooling anybody that it's some kind of apolitic
36.
by homonculus1 4y ago
That was already listed under option b)
37.
by homonculus1 4y ago
Block his number, at least. 911 is a service, not a right. I can't fathom why they would continue sending public servants on those calls.
38.
by homonculus1 4y ago
Why not just... play with the LEGO?
39.
by homonculus1 4y ago
You're putting the cart before the horse. Exploration is cool BECAUSE it's risky. If it were a walk in the park it would just be data entry.
40.
by homonculus1 4y ago
No. That's an abuse of language. Surveillance is persistent monitoring of an area, person, etc. with a strong implication of record retention and intent to escalate situations which may arise. Looking upon your way as you travel is not
41.
by homonculus1 4y ago
Time to pass a law to force simplydt to wear a stiff leather collar that administers a painful electric shock every 30 seconds. Of course, although possible, this won't happen any time soon.
42.
by homonculus1 4y ago
You'd think we ought to at least be able to build some monumental architecture some of the time, even if cost is prohibitive for ordinary buildings as the argument goes. It's simply impossible to my mind that we command more e
43.
by homonculus1 4y ago
That is quite a theory...
44.
by homonculus1 4y ago
"Mass murder, organized oppression, and social violence." Alexa, what is necklacing?
45.
by homonculus1 4y ago
So the whites were the only ones who managed to keep their house clean--now that they're deposed, what has been gained? What have the blacks accomplished with their autonomy?
46.
by homonculus1 4y ago
You make a fine point... maybe their country did get reduced to a heap of corruption and banditry by a gang of terrorists--but at least the whites aren't in charge!
47.
by homonculus1 4y ago
Ahh, oops! Next question!
48.
by homonculus1 4y ago
They deliver the baby halfway through the cervix and then crush its head.
49.
by homonculus1 4y ago
It's a far cry from Nerf, with fiberglass on top of it, but styrofoam is actually used inside bumpers
50.
by homonculus1 4y ago
And what happens when the ECHR starts oppressing people? It's turtles all the way down!
51.
by homonculus1 4y ago
I express many unpopular opinions online, including right here on Hackernews. If offending people online is a criminal offense, then my freedom and standing in law-abiding society are at risk. Your posts are genuinely and seriously offensiv
52.
by homonculus1 4y ago
You and I are UK citizens for the moment. I assert that your comment here is grossly indecent and offensive to me. Will the UK government summon you for mandatory interrogation due to my complaint, or will they dismiss me out of hand? Obvio
53.
by homonculus1 4y ago
You need to check in somewhere
54.
by homonculus1 4y ago
1. Detransition accounts are information 2. Twitter bans users specifically to suppress that information, i.e. minimize its reach, i.e. hide it Bald-facedly denying censorship is certainly not intellectually productive, might I suggest yo
55.
by homonculus1 4y ago
That is a ridiculously tortured argument. The censor not extending his reach to outside venues doesn't make him any less a censor.
56.
by homonculus1 4y ago
It's just fundamentally a bad idea. Software should never, ever bother the user during use about how it's being used. That's what tutorials and documentation are for. No matter how clever and subtle you think you're be
57.
by homonculus1 4y ago
Yes it is, you are just conflating ownership and creation. Intellectual property exists to provide a bargaining framework for human creators, there's no reason that joint ownership of it need imply that mechanically-generated combinati
58.
by homonculus1 4y ago
The answer is "yes"
59.
by homonculus1 4y ago
Yes and yes
60.
by homonculus1 4y ago
Yes...?

More ›